Benchmarking public policies to create healthy food environments compared to best practice: the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index in Guatemala

被引:1
|
作者
Sanchez-Nochez, Carmen Maria [1 ,2 ]
Ramirez-Zea, Manuel [1 ]
Vandevijvere, Stefanie [3 ,4 ]
Kroker-Lobos, Maria Fernanda [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nutr Cent Amer & Panama INCAP, INCAP Res Ctr Prevent Chron Dis, Calzada Roosevelt 6-25,Zona 11, Guatemala City 01188, Guatemala
[2] Univ San Carlos De, Fac Pharm & Chem Sci, Grad Sch, 11th Ave,Zone 12, Guatemala City 01012, Guatemala
[3] Sci Inst Publ Hlth Sciensano, Unit Epidemiol, J Wytsmanstr 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Populat Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Auckland Pc 1010, New Zealand
关键词
Guatemala; Food policies; Healthy food environment; INFORMAS; Food-EPI; Nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; DOUBLE BURDEN; OBESITY; UNDERNUTRITION; DISEASES;
D O I
10.1186/s13690-022-00928-w
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Benchmarking the implementation of healthy food environment public policies against international best practices may accelerate the government response to prevent obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the countries. The aim of the study was to determine the extent of food environment policy implementation in Guatemala and to identify and prioritize actions for the government to accelerate their implementation. Methods The INFORMAS Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI from the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support) was used. Evidence of implementation for 50 good practice indicators within the seven food policies and six infrastructure support domains was compiled, and subsequently validated by Guatemalan government officials. A national civil society expert panel on public health and nutrition performed an online assessment of the implementation of healthy food environment policies against best international practices. The level of agreement among evaluators was measured using the Gwet second order agreement coefficient (AC2). The expert panel recommended actions for each indicator during on-site workshops and those actions were prioritized by importance and achievability. Results The expert panel rated implementation at zero for 26% of the indicators, very low for 28% of indicators, low for 42%, and medium for 4% of indicators (none were rated high). Indicators at medium implementation were related to the use of evidence for developing policies and ingredient list/nutrition information panels on packaged foods. Seventy-seven actions were recommended prioritizing the top 10 for immediate action. The Gwet AC2 was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80), indicating a good concordance among experts. Conclusions In the Food-EPI of Guatemala, almost all indicators of good practice had a low or less level of implementation. The expert panel proposed 12 priority actions to accelerate policy implementation to tackle obesity and NCDs in the country.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The INFORMAS healthy food environment policy index (Food-EPI) in Mexico: An assessment of implementation gaps and priority recommendations
    Nieto, Claudia
    Rodriguez, Estefania
    Sanchez-Bazan, Karina
    Tolentino-Mayo, Lizbeth
    Carriedo-Lutzenkirchen, Angela
    Vandevijvere, Stefanie
    Barquera, Simon
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2019, 20 : 67 - 77
  • [42] Benchmarking as a Public Health Strategy for Creating Healthy Food Environments: An Evaluation of the INFORMAS Initiative (2012-2020)
    Sacks, Gary
    Kwon, Janelle
    Vandevijvere, Stefanie
    Swinburn, Boyd
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 42, 2021, 2021, 42 : 345 - 362
  • [43] Potential for healthy eating in a Brazilian public university food environment
    Rodrigues, Camila Batista
    Monteiro, Luana Silva
    de Paula, Nilma Morcerf
    Pereira, Rosangela Alves
    REVISTA DE NUTRICAO-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 36
  • [44] Implementation level of best practice policies by Italian government for healthier food environments
    Zace, D.
    Specchia, M. L.
    Di Pilla, A.
    Carini, E.
    Cacciatore, P.
    Frisicale, E.
    Silano, M.
    Ricciardi, W.
    Sassi, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [45] Evaluating food-related policies in Germany using the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI)
    Geffert, K.
    von Philipsborn, P.
    Stratil, J. M.
    Rehfuess, E. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [46] A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study
    Janelle Kwon
    Adrian J. Cameron
    David Hammond
    Christine M. White
    Lana Vanderlee
    Jasmin Bhawra
    Gary Sacks
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [47] The use of private regulatory measures to create healthy food retail environments: a scoping review
    Dancey, Jane
    Reeve, Belinda
    Jones, Alexandra
    Ferguson, Megan
    van Burgel, Emma
    Brimblecombe, Julie
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [48] A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: Findings from the International Food Policy Study
    Kwon, Janelle
    Cameron, Adrian J.
    Hammond, David
    White, Christine M.
    Vanderlee, Lana
    Bhawra, Jasmin
    Sacks, Gary
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [49] Nutrition policies in Germany: a systematic assessment with the Food Environment Policy Index
    von Philipsborn, Peter
    Geffert, Karin
    Klinger, Carmen
    Hebestreit, Antje
    Stratil, Jan
    Rehfuess, Eva Annette
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2022, 25 (06) : 1691 - 1700
  • [50] Navigating the online food environment: policy pathways for promoting food access, transparency, and healthy food choices online
    Greenthal, Eva
    Marx, Katherine
    Friedman, Emily
    John, Sara
    Johnson, Joelle
    LiPuma, Christina
    Nara, Deanna
    Sorscher, Sarah
    Gardner, Karen
    Musicus, Aviva
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2024, 11