Weed interference in the sweet sorghum crop

被引:18
|
作者
Silva, Cezar [1 ]
da Silva, Alexandre Ferreira [2 ]
do Vale, Welington Gonzaga [1 ]
Galon, Leandro [3 ]
Petter, Fabiano Andre [1 ]
May, Andre [2 ]
Karam, Decio [2 ]
机构
[1] UFMT, BR-1200 Sinop, MT, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Milho & Sorgo, BR-35701970 Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil
[3] UFFS, BR-99700000 Erechim, RS, Brazil
关键词
BRS; 511; competition; control periods; Sorghum bicolor;
D O I
10.1590/1678-4499.0119
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This work aimed to carry out a phytosociological study and to determine the critical period of weed interference on sweet sorghum crop. The experimental design adopted was randomized blocks with three replications. Treatments consisted by increasing periods of control or coexistence of weeds in different phenological stages of crop growth: 0-3 (V-3), 0-5 (V-5), 0-7 (V-7), 0-9 (V-9), 0-11(V-11) fully expanded leaves and 0-R-5 (harvest). The weed community was evaluated based on number the number of individuals and their correspondent dry mass accumulation, for each weed population in different periods of coexistence. Sweet sorghum was harvested at 101 days after emergence, when was measured plant height, culm diameter, total soluble solids (degrees Brix) in function of coexistence periods between crop and weeds, besides the yield of culms. Commelina benghalensis e Panicum maximum were the two species of higher relative importance at the crop harvested. The lack of weed control, during the crop cycle, caused an increase in total soluble solids (degrees Brix) and reduction of, respectively, 9 and 25% in plant height and culms diameter when compared with the hoed control during all cycle. Accepting losses of 5% in culm yield, was observed that the critical period of weed interference corresponded to the period of time between the phenological growth stage V-3 to V-11.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 445
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Potential yield loss in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) with weed interference in the United States
    Dille, J. Anita
    Stahlman, Phillip W.
    Thompson, Curtis R.
    Bean, Brent W.
    Soltani, Nader
    Sikkema, Peter H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (04) : 624 - 629
  • [32] EFFECTS OF WEED MANAGEMENT AND PLANT ARRANGEMENTS ON YIELD INDEX OF SWEET SORGHUM
    Reis, Ronaldo Matias
    Freitas, Matheus Souza
    Silva, Daniel Valadao
    Mendes Pereira, Gustavo Antonio
    Rocha de Jesus Passos, Ana Beatriz
    da Silva, Alexandre Ferreira
    da Silva, Antonio Alberto
    dos Reis, Marcelo Rodrigues
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2019, 35 (04): : 983 - 991
  • [33] Periods of Weed Interference in Sorghum Grown Under Lowland Conditions
    Andres, A.
    Concenco, G.
    Schwanke, A. M. L.
    Theisen, G.
    Melo, P. T. B. S.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2009, 27 (02) : 229 - 234
  • [34] Crop Seeding Level: Implications for Weed Management in Sweet Corn
    Williams, Martin M., II
    Boydston, Rick A.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2013, 61 (03) : 437 - 442
  • [35] Prospects for weed control through crop interference.
    夏国军
    杨好伟
    王文静
    中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2001, (02) : 96 - 97
  • [36] Weed interference as related to vegetable crop management systems
    Pereira, W
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TIMING OF FIELD PRODUCTION IN VEGETABLE CROPS, 2003, (607): : 227 - 235
  • [37] Corn Tolerance to Weed Interference Varies with Preceding Crop
    Anderson, Randy L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (03) : 486 - 491
  • [38] PROSPECTS FOR WEED-CONTROL THROUGH CROP INTERFERENCE
    JORDAN, N
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1993, 3 (01) : 84 - 91
  • [39] Sweet sorghum as a whole-crop feedstock for ethanol production
    Barcelos, Carolina A.
    Maeda, Roberto N.
    Santa Anna, Lidia Maria M.
    Pereira, Nei, Jr.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 94 : 46 - 56
  • [40] Crop rotation, cover crop, and weed management effects on weed seedbanks and yields in snap bean, sweet corn, and cabbage
    Brainard, Daniel C.
    Bellinder, Robin R.
    Hahn, Russell R.
    Shah, Denis A.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2008, 56 (03) : 434 - 441