Weed interference in the sweet sorghum crop

被引:18
|
作者
Silva, Cezar [1 ]
da Silva, Alexandre Ferreira [2 ]
do Vale, Welington Gonzaga [1 ]
Galon, Leandro [3 ]
Petter, Fabiano Andre [1 ]
May, Andre [2 ]
Karam, Decio [2 ]
机构
[1] UFMT, BR-1200 Sinop, MT, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Milho & Sorgo, BR-35701970 Sete Lagoas, MG, Brazil
[3] UFFS, BR-99700000 Erechim, RS, Brazil
关键词
BRS; 511; competition; control periods; Sorghum bicolor;
D O I
10.1590/1678-4499.0119
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This work aimed to carry out a phytosociological study and to determine the critical period of weed interference on sweet sorghum crop. The experimental design adopted was randomized blocks with three replications. Treatments consisted by increasing periods of control or coexistence of weeds in different phenological stages of crop growth: 0-3 (V-3), 0-5 (V-5), 0-7 (V-7), 0-9 (V-9), 0-11(V-11) fully expanded leaves and 0-R-5 (harvest). The weed community was evaluated based on number the number of individuals and their correspondent dry mass accumulation, for each weed population in different periods of coexistence. Sweet sorghum was harvested at 101 days after emergence, when was measured plant height, culm diameter, total soluble solids (degrees Brix) in function of coexistence periods between crop and weeds, besides the yield of culms. Commelina benghalensis e Panicum maximum were the two species of higher relative importance at the crop harvested. The lack of weed control, during the crop cycle, caused an increase in total soluble solids (degrees Brix) and reduction of, respectively, 9 and 25% in plant height and culms diameter when compared with the hoed control during all cycle. Accepting losses of 5% in culm yield, was observed that the critical period of weed interference corresponded to the period of time between the phenological growth stage V-3 to V-11.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 445
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF CROP DENSITY ON WEED INTERFERENCE IN MAIZE
    TOLLENAAR, M
    DIBO, AA
    AGUILERA, A
    WEISE, SF
    SWANTON, CJ
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1994, 86 (04) : 591 - 595
  • [22] Periods of weed interference in sunflower crop in Rondonia
    Alves, Gibran da S.
    Tartaglia, Francilene de L.
    Rosa, Jhonatas C.
    de Lima, Pamela C.
    Cardoso, Gleibson D.
    Beltrao, Napoleao E. de M.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2013, 17 (03): : 275 - 282
  • [23] MIDWESTERN CULTIVATION OF SWEET SORGHUM AS A RENEWABLE ENERGY CROP
    ARTHUR, MF
    JACKSON, DR
    KRESOVICH, S
    LAWHON, WT
    SUGAR Y AZUCAR, 1979, 74 (06): : 72 - 72
  • [24] Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.) interference in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]: the influence of weed and crop density
    Amare, Tesfay
    Tessema, Taye
    Bekeko, Zelalem
    Mesfine, Tewodros
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2025, 81 (01) : 415 - 426
  • [25] Sweet-Sorghum - An energetical crop of the future in Romania
    Roman, GV
    Mitroi, A
    Roman, AM
    Ion, V
    Dumbrava, M
    BIOMASS FOR ENERGY AND INDUSTRY, 1998, : 1039 - 1041
  • [26] SWEET SORGHUM - POTENTIAL SUGAR CROP IN SOUTH TEXAS
    COWLEY, WR
    SMITH, BA
    SUGAR JOURNAL, 1972, 34 (09): : 20 - &
  • [27] THE WATER USE OF SWEET SORGHUM AND DEVELOPMENT OF CROP COEFFICIENTS
    Martinez-Cruz, Tania E.
    Slack, Donald C.
    Ogden, Kimberly L.
    Ottman, Michael
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2015, 64 (01) : 93 - 104
  • [28] Nitrogen Balance in a Sweet Sorghum Crop in a Mediterranean Environment
    Scordia, Danilo
    Cosentino, Salvatore Luciano
    Mantineo, Mariadaniela
    Testa, Giorgio
    Patane, Cristina
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [29] Response of two sweet potato cultivars to weed interference
    Harrison, Howard F., Jr.
    Jackson, D. Michael
    CROP PROTECTION, 2011, 30 (10) : 1291 - 1296
  • [30] SENSITIVITY OF SWEET POTATO GENOTYPES TO CLOMAZONE AND WEED INTERFERENCE
    Dos Santos, Edson Aparecido
    De Andrade Junior, Valter Carvalho
    Silva Viana, Daniel Jose
    Dos Santos, Albertir Aparecido
    Medina Da Silva, Antonio Julio
    Teixeira Fialho, Cintia Maria
    REVISTA CAATINGA, 2018, 31 (02) : 352 - 359