The reliability of MOSH/MOAH data: a comment on a recently published article

被引：10

作者：

Bratinova, Stefanka ^{[1
]}

Hoekstra, Eddo ^{[2
]}

Emons, Hendrik ^{[1
]}

Hutzler, Christoph ^{[3
]}

Kappenstein, Oliver ^{[3
]}

Biedermann, Maurus ^{[4
]}

McCombie, Gregor ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Geel, Belgium

[2] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr JRC, Ispra, Italy

[3] German Fed Inst Risk Assessment BfR, Berlin, Germany

[4] Official Food Control Author Canton Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

来源：

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY | 2020年 / 15卷 / 03期

关键词：

MOSH; MOAH; Measurand; Chemical food analysis; Interlaboratory comparisons; Food matrices;

D O I：

10.1007/s00003-020-01287-w

中图分类号：

TS2 [食品工业];

学科分类号：

0832 ;

摘要：

In this article, we analyse recently published material by Koster et al. (Food Addit Contam Part A, 10.1080/19440049.2019.1678770, 2019) entitled "Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons in Foods: Is the Data Reliable?". Koster et al. claim to have traced the reasons for laboratory failures to "deliver robust and reliable test results" for the analysis of MOSH/MOAH in some food matrices, however, a careful review revealed that this publication falls short in considering several aspects of assessing the reliability and comparability of analytical data produced by different laboratories.

引用

页码：285 / 287

页数：3

共 50 条

[41] Comment on published article: Cannot intubate and cannot ventilate scenario in an infant for airway assessment
Solanki, Sohan Lal
Doctor, Jeson R.
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 (02) : 164 - 164
[42] Matching the model to the available data to predict wheat, barley, or canola yield: A review of recently published models and data
Clark, Robert
Dahlhaus, Peter
Robinson, Nathan
Larkins, Jo-ann
Morse-McNabb, Elizabeth
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 211
[43] OUTDOOR ONLY + COMMENT ON RECENTLY PUBLISHED 1912 PHOTOGRAPH OF FAMILY GATHERING FEATURING A MEISNER-ROCKER-SWING
DAUENHAUER, W
AMERICAN HERITAGE, 1994, 45 (06) : 10 - 10
[44] "This article is interesting, however": exploring the language use in the peer review comment of articles published in the BMJ
Zhang, Guangyao
Wang, Licheng
Xie, Weixi
Shang, Furong
Xia, Xinlu
Jiang, Chunlin
Wang, Xianwen
ASLIB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 74 (03) : 399 - 416
[45] Who decides if research will be published, authors or sponsors? Comment on the article by Curtis et al Reply
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (08) : 1271 - 1272
[46] Understanding authorized generics-A review of the published clinical data COMMENT
Alderfer, Justine
Hansen, Richard A.
Mattingly, T. Joseph, II
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 46 (06) : 1489 - 1497
[47] delta'-Strengthening of underaged aluminium-lithium-alloys. Discussions of recently published experimental data
Nembach, E
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 1997, 36 (12) : 1409 - 1413
[48] Published abstracts in obstetrical anesthesia: Full publication rates and data reliability
Halpern, SH
Palmer, S
Angle, P
Tarshis, J
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 94 (1A) : U26 - U26
[49] Supporting parents and parenting: An overview of data-based papers recently published in Contemporary Nurse
Jackson, Debra
Power, Tamara
Dean, Sue
Potgieter, Ingrid
Cleary, Michelle
CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2014, 46 (02) : 142 - 147
[50] Use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors in older patients: a review of recently published data
Klastersky, Jean A.
Dal Lago, Lissandra
Lalami, Yassine
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (04) : 258 - 261

← 1 2 3 4 5 →