Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Todenhoefer, Tilman [1 ,2 ]
Hennenlotter, Joerg [1 ]
Guttenberg, Philipp [1 ]
Mohrhardt, Sarah [1 ]
Kuehs, Ursula [1 ]
Esser, Michael [1 ]
Aufderklamm, Stefan [1 ]
Bier, Simone [1 ]
Harland, Niklas [1 ]
Rausch, Steffen [1 ]
Gakis, Georgios [1 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [1 ]
Schwentner, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Dept Urol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC V3Z 6H, Canada
关键词
Urine markers; Prediction; Recurrence; Risk; Surveillance; Anticipatory positive; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS; VOIDED-URINE; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; MULTITARGET; RECURRENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic approach to directly compare the ability of a urine marker panel to predict the risk of recurrence and progression in bladder cancer (BC) patients with no evidence of relapse during surveillance for NMIBC. Methods: One hundred fourteen patients who underwent urine marker testing during surveillance for NMIBC and who had no evidence of BC recurrence were included. For all patients cytology, Fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+) and Nuclear matrix protein 22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NMP22) were performed. All patients completed at least 24 months of endoscopic and clinical follow-up of after inclusion. Results: Within 24 months of follow-up, 38 (33.0%) patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 (9.8%) progression. Recurrence rates in patients with positive vs. negative cytology, FISH, uCyt+ and NMP22 were 52.6% vs. 21.9% (HR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.75-9.2; p < 0.001), 47.6% vs. 25.0% (HR 2.7; 1.2-6.2; p = 0.01), 43.8% vs. 22.4% (HR 3.3; 1.5-7.6; p = 0.003) and 43.8% vs. 16.7% (HR 4.2; 1.7-10.8; p = 0.001). In patients with negative cytology, a positive NMP22 test was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.01), whereas FISH or uCyt+ were not predictive of recurrence in these patients. In the group of patients with negative cytology and negative NMP22, only 13.5% and 5.4% developed recurrence and progression after 24 months. Conclusions: Patients with positive urine markers at time of negative cystoscopy are at increased risk of recurrence and progression. In patients with negative cytology, only NMP22 is predictive for recurrence. Patients with negative marker combinations including NMP22 harbour a low risk of recurrence. Therefore, the endoscopic follow-up regimen may be attenuated in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Urine Telomerase for Diagnosis and Surveillance of Bladder Cancer
    Lamarca, Angela
    Barriuso, Jorge
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [42] Diagnostic utility of tele-cystoscopy for bladder cancer surveillance.
    Beller, Haerin Lee
    Mills, James
    Mason, Jennifer
    Horton, Bethany J.
    Jones, Randy A.
    Corey, Thomas
    Sims, Terran
    Schenkman, Noah S.
    Krupski, Tracey Lynn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [43] BIOCHEMICALLY DETECTABLE TUMOR MARKERS IN URINE OF BLADDER CANCER-PATIENTS
    IRVING, CC
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1977, 37 (08) : 2872 - 2874
  • [44] Diagnostic and prognostic markers in bladder cancer
    Kogevinas, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 35 : S37 - S37
  • [45] Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Bladder Cancer
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kim, Wun-Jae
    Lerner, Seth P.
    Chun, Felix
    Kluth, Luis Alex
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2016, 2016 : 1 - 2
  • [46] Prognostic relevance of methylation markers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma
    Friedrich, MG
    Chandrasoma, S
    Siegmund, KD
    Weisenberger, DJ
    Cheng, JC
    Toma, MI
    Huland, H
    Jones, PA
    Liang, GN
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (17) : 2769 - 2778
  • [47] Considerations on the use of urine markers for bladder cancer
    van Rhijn, Bas W. G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (05) : 880 - 881
  • [48] Urine cytology, tumour markers and bladder cancer
    Halachmi, S
    Linn, JF
    Amiel, GE
    Moskovitz, B
    Nativ, O
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 82 (05): : 647 - 654
  • [49] Comparing CxBladder to Urine Cytology as Adjunct to Cystoscopy in Surveillance of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer-A Pilot Study
    Chai, C. A.
    Yeoh, W. S.
    Rajandram, R.
    Aung, K. P.
    Ong, T. A.
    Kuppusamy, S.
    Nazran, A.
    Kumaran, K.
    Razack, A. H. A.
    Teoh, J. Y.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [50] A MULTIPLEX MODEL OF COMBINING POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE MARKERS IN URINE FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Cao, Da-Long
    Yao, Xu-Dong
    Ye, Ding-Wei
    Zhu, Yao
    Zhang, Hai-Liang
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (04): : E763 - E764