Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Todenhoefer, Tilman [1 ,2 ]
Hennenlotter, Joerg [1 ]
Guttenberg, Philipp [1 ]
Mohrhardt, Sarah [1 ]
Kuehs, Ursula [1 ]
Esser, Michael [1 ]
Aufderklamm, Stefan [1 ]
Bier, Simone [1 ]
Harland, Niklas [1 ]
Rausch, Steffen [1 ]
Gakis, Georgios [1 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [1 ]
Schwentner, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Dept Urol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC V3Z 6H, Canada
关键词
Urine markers; Prediction; Recurrence; Risk; Surveillance; Anticipatory positive; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS; VOIDED-URINE; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; MULTITARGET; RECURRENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic approach to directly compare the ability of a urine marker panel to predict the risk of recurrence and progression in bladder cancer (BC) patients with no evidence of relapse during surveillance for NMIBC. Methods: One hundred fourteen patients who underwent urine marker testing during surveillance for NMIBC and who had no evidence of BC recurrence were included. For all patients cytology, Fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+) and Nuclear matrix protein 22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NMP22) were performed. All patients completed at least 24 months of endoscopic and clinical follow-up of after inclusion. Results: Within 24 months of follow-up, 38 (33.0%) patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 (9.8%) progression. Recurrence rates in patients with positive vs. negative cytology, FISH, uCyt+ and NMP22 were 52.6% vs. 21.9% (HR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.75-9.2; p < 0.001), 47.6% vs. 25.0% (HR 2.7; 1.2-6.2; p = 0.01), 43.8% vs. 22.4% (HR 3.3; 1.5-7.6; p = 0.003) and 43.8% vs. 16.7% (HR 4.2; 1.7-10.8; p = 0.001). In patients with negative cytology, a positive NMP22 test was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.01), whereas FISH or uCyt+ were not predictive of recurrence in these patients. In the group of patients with negative cytology and negative NMP22, only 13.5% and 5.4% developed recurrence and progression after 24 months. Conclusions: Patients with positive urine markers at time of negative cystoscopy are at increased risk of recurrence and progression. In patients with negative cytology, only NMP22 is predictive for recurrence. Patients with negative marker combinations including NMP22 harbour a low risk of recurrence. Therefore, the endoscopic follow-up regimen may be attenuated in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WHAT FALSE-NEGATIVE RATES ARE BLADDER CANCER PATIENTS AND URO-ONCOLOGISTS WILLING TO ACCEPT IN ORDER TO AVOID SURVEILLANCE CYSTOSCOPY?
    Sayyid, Rashid
    Sayyid, Abdallah
    Leao, Ricardo
    Ahmad, Ardalanejaz
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Hamilton, Robert
    Kulkarni, Girish
    Finelli, Antonio
    Zlotta, Alexandre
    Fleshner, Neil
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E369 - E369
  • [32] BLADDER ULTRASONOGRAPHY, CYTOLOGY AND URINE ANALYSIS AS ALTERNATIVES TO CYSTOSCOPY DURING SCREENING FOR NON-MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
    Elkenawi, Mohamed
    Harraz, Ahmed
    Farg, Hashim
    Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed
    El-Hefnawy, Ahmed
    Osman, Yasser
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E292 - E292
  • [33] Surveillance with microsatellite analysis of urine in bladder cancer patients treated by radiotherapy
    van Rhijn, BWG
    Smit, M
    van Geenen, D
    Wijnmaalen, A
    Kirkels, WJ
    van der Kwast, TH
    Kuenen-Boumeester, V
    Zwarthoff, EC
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (04) : 369 - 373
  • [34] A Genomic Urine Assay for Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy
    de Jong, Florus C.
    Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
    Boormans, Joost L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 66
  • [35] A Genomic Urine Assay for Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy
    de Jong, Florus C.
    Ifle, Iris G.
    van der Made, Angelique C.
    Kooper, Denise
    de Jong, Joep J.
    Franckena, Martine
    Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
    van Criekinge, Wim
    Incrocci, Luca
    Zwarthoff, Ellen C.
    Boormans, Joost L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 62 : 131 - 139
  • [36] Relevance of urine telomerase in the diagnosis of bladder cancer
    Sanchini, MA
    Gunelli, R
    Nanni, O
    Bravaccini, S
    Fabbri, C
    Sermasi, A
    Bercovich, E
    Ravaioli, A
    Amadori, D
    Calistri, D
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (16): : 2052 - 2056
  • [37] Prognostic Significance of Nondiagnostic Molecular Changes in Urine Detected by UroVysion Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization During Surveillance for Bladder Cancer
    Nguyen, Carvell T.
    Litt, David B.
    Dolar, Sandra E.
    Ulchaker, James C.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Brainard, Jennifer A.
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (02) : 347 - 350
  • [38] The role of urine markers, white light cystoscopy and fluorescence cystoscopy in recurrence, progression and follow-up of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Ilhan Karaoglu
    Antoine G. van der Heijden
    J. Alfred Witjes
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 651 - 659
  • [39] Significant lack of urine-based biomarkers to replace cystoscopy for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Miyake, Makito
    Owari, Takuya
    Hori, Shunta
    Fujimoto, Kiyohide
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2019, 8 : S332 - S334
  • [40] The role of urine markers, white light cystoscopy and fluorescence cystoscopy in recurrence, progression and follow-up of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Karaoglu, Ilhan
    van der Heijden, Antoine G.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (03) : 651 - 659