Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer

被引:24
|
作者
Todenhoefer, Tilman [1 ,2 ]
Hennenlotter, Joerg [1 ]
Guttenberg, Philipp [1 ]
Mohrhardt, Sarah [1 ]
Kuehs, Ursula [1 ]
Esser, Michael [1 ]
Aufderklamm, Stefan [1 ]
Bier, Simone [1 ]
Harland, Niklas [1 ]
Rausch, Steffen [1 ]
Gakis, Georgios [1 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [1 ]
Schwentner, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Dept Urol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Prostate Ctr, Vancouver, BC V3Z 6H, Canada
关键词
Urine markers; Prediction; Recurrence; Risk; Surveillance; Anticipatory positive; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INVASIVE UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA; MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS; VOIDED-URINE; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; MULTITARGET; RECURRENCE; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1089-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The role of urine markers in the surveillance of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is discussed extensively. In case of negative cystoscopy the additional prognostic value of these markers has not been clearly defined yet. The present study is the first systematic approach to directly compare the ability of a urine marker panel to predict the risk of recurrence and progression in bladder cancer (BC) patients with no evidence of relapse during surveillance for NMIBC. Methods: One hundred fourteen patients who underwent urine marker testing during surveillance for NMIBC and who had no evidence of BC recurrence were included. For all patients cytology, Fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (FISH), immunocytology (uCyt+) and Nuclear matrix protein 22 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NMP22) were performed. All patients completed at least 24 months of endoscopic and clinical follow-up of after inclusion. Results: Within 24 months of follow-up, 38 (33.0%) patients experienced disease recurrence and 11 (9.8%) progression. Recurrence rates in patients with positive vs. negative cytology, FISH, uCyt+ and NMP22 were 52.6% vs. 21.9% (HR = 3.9; 95% CI 1.75-9.2; p < 0.001), 47.6% vs. 25.0% (HR 2.7; 1.2-6.2; p = 0.01), 43.8% vs. 22.4% (HR 3.3; 1.5-7.6; p = 0.003) and 43.8% vs. 16.7% (HR 4.2; 1.7-10.8; p = 0.001). In patients with negative cytology, a positive NMP22 test was associated with a shorter time to recurrence (p = 0.01), whereas FISH or uCyt+ were not predictive of recurrence in these patients. In the group of patients with negative cytology and negative NMP22, only 13.5% and 5.4% developed recurrence and progression after 24 months. Conclusions: Patients with positive urine markers at time of negative cystoscopy are at increased risk of recurrence and progression. In patients with negative cytology, only NMP22 is predictive for recurrence. Patients with negative marker combinations including NMP22 harbour a low risk of recurrence. Therefore, the endoscopic follow-up regimen may be attenuated in this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic relevance of positive urine markers in patients with negative cystoscopy during surveillance of bladder cancer
    Tilman Todenhöfer
    Jörg Hennenlotter
    Philipp Guttenberg
    Sarah Mohrhardt
    Ursula Kuehs
    Michael Esser
    Stefan Aufderklamm
    Simone Bier
    Niklas Harland
    Steffen Rausch
    Georgios Gakis
    Arnulf Stenzl
    Christian Schwentner
    BMC Cancer, 15
  • [2] POSITIVE URINE MARKERS PREDICT RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS WITH NEGATIVE CYSTOSCOPY DURING SURVEILLANCE FOR BLADDER CANCER
    Todenhoefer, Tilman
    Hennenlotter, Joerg
    Guttenberg, Philipp
    Gerber, Valentina
    Kuehs, Ursula
    Aufderklamm, Stefan
    Gakis, Georgios
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Schwentner, Christian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E238 - E238
  • [3] Urine markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Rieken, Malte
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Lotan, Yair
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (03) : 222 - 229
  • [4] Management of Patients with Normal Cystoscopy but Positive Cytology or Urine Markers
    Palou, Joan
    Brausi, Maurizio
    Catto, James W. F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 548 - 554
  • [5] Molecular prognostic markers of urine bladder cancer
    Pavlov, V. N.
    Izmailov, A. A.
    Akhmadishina, L. Z.
    Victorova, T. V.
    Izmailova, S. M.
    Urmantsev, M. F.
    Alekseev, A. V.
    Zagitov, A. R.
    Kutliyarov, L. M.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2012, 8 (02): : 32 - 36
  • [7] Urine markers for bladder cancer surveillance: A systematic review
    van Rhijn, BWG
    van der Poel, HG
    van der Kwast, TH
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (06) : 736 - 748
  • [8] Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer
    Sullivan, Peggy S.
    Chan, Jessica B.
    Levin, Mary R.
    Rao, Jianyu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 2 (04): : 412 - 440
  • [9] Reflex fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for suspicious urinary cytology in patients with bladder cancer with negative surveillance cystoscopy
    Kim, Philip H.
    Sukhu, Ranjit
    Cordon, Billy H.
    Sfakianos, John P.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Hakimi, A. Ari
    Dalbagni, Guido
    Lin, Oscar
    Herr, Harry W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (03) : 354 - 359
  • [10] The clinical relevance of urine-based markers for diagnosis of bladder cancer
    Eissa, Sanaa
    Swellam, Menha
    Amin, Amr
    Balbaa, Mohamed E.
    Yacout, Galila Ahmed
    El-Zayat, Tarek Mostafa
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) : 513 - 518