Gravity field models derived from Swarm GPS data

被引:32
|
作者
da Encarnacao, Joao Teixeira [1 ]
Arnold, Daniel [2 ]
Bezdek, Ales [3 ]
Dahle, Christoph [4 ]
Doornbos, Eelco [1 ]
van den IJssel, Jose [1 ]
Jaggi, Adrian [2 ]
Mayer-Guerr, Torsten [5 ]
Sebera, Josef [3 ]
Visser, Pieter [1 ]
Zehentner, Norbert [5 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bern, Astron Inst, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Astron Inst, Prague, Czech Republic
[4] Univ Bern, Geosci & Astron Inst, German Res Ctr, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Graz Univ Technol, Graz, Austria
来源
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE | 2016年 / 68卷
关键词
Gravity field; Swarm; High-low satellite-to-satellite tracking; GRACE; KINEMATIC ORBITS; SATELLITE; GRACE; CONSTELLATION; CHAMP;
D O I
10.1186/s40623-016-0499-9
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
It is of great interest to numerous geophysical studies that the time series of global gravity field models derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data remains uninterrupted after the end of this mission. With this in mind, some institutes have been spending efforts to estimate gravity field models from alternative sources of gravimetric data. This study focuses on the gravity field solutions estimated from Swarm global positioning system (GPS) data, produced by the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern, the Astronomical Institute (ASU, Czech Academy of Sciences) and Institute of Geodesy (IfG, Graz University of Technology). The three sets of solutions are based on different approaches, namely the celestial mechanics approach, the acceleration approach and the short-arc approach, respectively. We derive the maximum spatial resolution of the time-varying gravity signal in the Swarm gravity field models to be degree 12, in comparison with the more accurate models obtained from K-band ranging data of GRACE. We demonstrate that the combination of the GPS-driven models produced with the three different approaches improves the accuracy in all analysed monthly solutions, with respect to any of them. In other words, the combined gravity field model consistently benefits from the individual strengths of each separate solution. The improved accuracy of the combined model is expected to bring benefits to the geophysical studies during the period when no dedicated gravimetric mission is operational.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Loading Correction Model for GPS Measurements Derived from Multiple-Data Combined Monthly Gravity
    Luo, Jiesi
    Chen, Wei
    Ray, Jim
    van Dam, Tonie
    Li, Jiancheng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [32] Assessment of the EGM2008 Gravity Field in Algeria Using Gravity and GPS/Levelling Data
    Daho, S. A. Benahmed
    GRAVITY, GEOID AND EARTH OBSERVATION, 2010, 135 : 459 - 466
  • [33] Evaluation of Recent GRACE and GOCE Satellite Gravity Models and Combined Models Using GPS/Leveling and Gravity Data in China
    Li, Jiancheng
    Jiang, Weiping
    Zou, Xiancai
    Xu, Xinyu
    Shen, Wenbin
    GRAVITY, GEOID AND HEIGHT SYSTEMS, 2014, 141 : 67 - 74
  • [34] Crustal models of the eastern Superior Province, Quebec, derived from new gravity data
    Telmat, H
    Mareschal, JC
    Gariépy, C
    David, J
    Antonuk, CN
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2000, 37 (02) : 385 - 397
  • [35] Error analysis of total field models derived from POGS data
    UltreGuerard, P
    Achache, J
    JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1997, 49 (2-3): : 453 - 467
  • [36] Earth’s gravity field modelling based on satellite accelerations derived from onboard GPS phase measurements
    X. Guo
    P. Ditmar
    Q. Zhao
    R. Klees
    H. H. Farahani
    Journal of Geodesy, 2017, 91 : 1049 - 1068
  • [37] Earth's gravity field modelling based on satellite accelerations derived from onboard GPS phase measurements
    Guo, X.
    Ditmar, P.
    Zhao, Q.
    Klees, R.
    Farahani, H. H.
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2017, 91 (09) : 1049 - 1068
  • [38] First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches
    Roland Pail
    Sean Bruinsma
    Federica Migliaccio
    Christoph Förste
    Helmut Goiginger
    Wolf-Dieter Schuh
    Eduard Höck
    Mirko Reguzzoni
    Jan Martin Brockmann
    Oleg Abrikosov
    Martin Veicherts
    Thomas Fecher
    Reinhard Mayrhofer
    Ina Krasbutter
    Fernando Sansò
    Carl Christian Tscherning
    Journal of Geodesy, 2011, 85 : 819 - 843
  • [39] First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches
    Pail, Roland
    Bruinsma, Sean
    Migliaccio, Federica
    Foerste, Christoph
    Goiginger, Helmut
    Schuh, Wolf-Dieter
    Hoeck, Eduard
    Reguzzoni, Mirko
    Brockmann, Jan Martin
    Abrikosov, Oleg
    Veicherts, Martin
    Fecher, Thomas
    Mayrhofer, Reinhard
    Krasbutter, Ina
    Sanso, Fernando
    Tscherning, Carl Christian
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2011, 85 (11) : 819 - 843
  • [40] Deriving main field and secular variation models from synthetic Swarm satellite and observatory data
    Lesur V.
    Macmillan S.
    Thomson A.
    Earth, Planets and Space, 2006, 58 (4): : 409 - 416