First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches

被引:386
|
作者
Pail, Roland [1 ]
Bruinsma, Sean [2 ]
Migliaccio, Federica [3 ]
Foerste, Christoph [4 ,5 ]
Goiginger, Helmut [6 ]
Schuh, Wolf-Dieter [7 ]
Hoeck, Eduard [8 ]
Reguzzoni, Mirko [3 ]
Brockmann, Jan Martin [7 ]
Abrikosov, Oleg [4 ,5 ,9 ]
Veicherts, Martin [10 ]
Fecher, Thomas [1 ]
Mayrhofer, Reinhard [6 ]
Krasbutter, Ina [7 ]
Sanso, Fernando [11 ]
Tscherning, Carl Christian [10 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Astron & Phys Geodesy, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] CNES DCT SI GS, Dept Terr & Planetary Geodesy, F-31401 Toulouse 9, France
[3] Politecn Milan, DIIAR Sez Rilevamento, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[4] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Dept Geodesy & Remote Sensing 1, Sect Global Geomonitoring 1 2, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[5] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, Grav Field, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[6] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Theoret Geodesy & Satellite Geodesy, A-8010 Graz, Austria
[7] Univ Bonn, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
[8] Austrian Acad Sci, Space Res Inst, Dept Satellite Geodesy, A-8042 Graz, Austria
[9] DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
[10] Univ Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Inst, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[11] Politecn Milan, Polo Reg Como, I-22100 Como, Italy
关键词
Gravity field; GOCE; Gradiometry; GPS; Spherical harmonics; Global gravity model; RECOVERY; GRACE; REGULARIZATION; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-011-0467-x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Three gravity field models, parameterized in terms of spherical harmonic coefficients, have been computed from 71 days of GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer) orbit and gradiometer data by applying independent gravity field processing methods. These gravity models are one major output of the European Space Agency (ESA) project GOCE High-level Processing Facility (HPF). The processing philosophies and architectures of these three complementary methods are presented and discussed, emphasizing the specific features of the three approaches. The resulting GOCE gravity field models, representing the first models containing the novel measurement type of gravity gradiometry ever computed, are analysed and assessed in detail. Together with the coefficient estimates, full variance-covariance matrices provide error information about the coefficient solutions. A comparison with state-of-the-art GRACE and combined gravity field models reveals the additional contribution of GOCE based on only 71 days of data. Compared with combined gravity field models, large deviations appear in regions where the terrestrial gravity data are known to be of low accuracy. The GOCE performance, assessed against the GRACE-only model ITG-Grace2010s, becomes superior at degree 150, and beyond. GOCE provides significant additional information of the global Earth gravity field, with an accuracy of the 2-month GOCE gravity field models of 10 cm in terms of geoid heights, and 3 mGal in terms of gravity anomalies, globally at a resolution of 100 km (degree/order 200).
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 843
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] First GOCE gravity field models derived by three different approaches
    Roland Pail
    Sean Bruinsma
    Federica Migliaccio
    Christoph Förste
    Helmut Goiginger
    Wolf-Dieter Schuh
    Eduard Höck
    Mirko Reguzzoni
    Jan Martin Brockmann
    Oleg Abrikosov
    Martin Veicherts
    Thomas Fecher
    Reinhard Mayrhofer
    Ina Krasbutter
    Fernando Sansò
    Carl Christian Tscherning
    Journal of Geodesy, 2011, 85 : 819 - 843
  • [2] Comparison of GOCE-GPS gravity fields derived by different approaches
    Baur, O.
    Bock, H.
    Hoeck, E.
    Jaeggi, A.
    Krauss, S.
    Mayer-Guerr, T.
    Reubelt, T.
    Siemes, C.
    Zehentner, N.
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2014, 88 (10) : 959 - 973
  • [3] Comparison of GOCE-GPS gravity fields derived by different approaches
    O. Baur
    H. Bock
    E. Höck
    A. Jäggi
    S. Krauss
    T. Mayer-Gürr
    T. Reubelt
    C. Siemes
    N. Zehentner
    Journal of Geodesy, 2014, 88 : 959 - 973
  • [4] GOCE gravity gradients versus global gravity field models
    Bouman, Johannes
    Fuchs, Martin J.
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 189 (02) : 846 - 850
  • [5] Various approaches for gravity field recovery by using the GOCE satellite orbits
    Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu
    610031, China
    Cehui Xuebao, 2 (142-149):
  • [6] Evaluation of the GOCE-Based Gravity Field Models in Turkey
    Ince, E. S.
    Erol, B.
    Sideris, M. G.
    GRAVITY, GEOID AND HEIGHT SYSTEMS, 2014, 141 : 93 - 99
  • [7] GOCE gravity field processing
    Pail, R
    Schuh, WD
    Wermuth, M
    GRAVITY, GEOID AND SPACE MISSIONS, 2005, 129 : 36 - +
  • [8] Gravity field models derived from the second degree radial derivatives of the GOCE mission: a case study
    Marchenko, Alexander N.
    Marchenko, Dmitriy A.
    Lopushansky, Alexander N.
    ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2016, 59 (06)
  • [9] Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Norway
    Sprlak, M.
    Gerlach, C.
    Pettersen, B. R.
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2012, 2 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [10] Evaluation of the first GOCE static gravity field models using terrestrial gravity, vertical deflections and EGM2008 quasigeoid heights
    C. Hirt
    T. Gruber
    W. E. Featherstone
    Journal of Geodesy, 2011, 85 : 723 - 740