Gut Microbiota Implications for Health and Welfare in Farm Animals: A Review

被引:55
|
作者
Chen, Siyu [1 ]
Luo, Shuyan [1 ]
Yan, Chao [2 ]
机构
[1] Foshan Univ, Sch Life Sci & Engn, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Anim Mol Design & Precise, Foshan 528225, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Lab Lingnan Modern Agr, Genome Anal Lab,Minist Agr,Agr Genom Inst Shenzhe, Shenzhen 518124, Peoples R China
来源
ANIMALS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
farm animal; fecal microbiota transplantation; gut microbiota; welfare; GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT MICROBIOTA; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION; GERM-FREE; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; EARLY-LIFE; FECAL TRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNE DEVELOPMENT; STRESS-RESPONSE; BRAIN; HOST;
D O I
10.3390/ani12010093
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Farm animal health and welfare have been paid increasing concern in the world, which is generally assessed by the measurements of physical health, immune response, behavior, and physiological indicators, such as stress-related hormone, cortisone, and norepinephrine. Gut microbiota as a "forgotten organ" has been reported for its great influence on the host phenotypes through the immune, neural, and endocrine pathways to affect the host health and behavior. In addition, fecal microbiota transplantation as a novel approach is applied to regulating the composition and function of the recipient farm animals. In this review, we summarized recent studies that gut microbiota influenced health, immunity, behavior, and stress response, as well as the progress of fecal microbiota transplantation in farm animals. The review will provide new insights into the measurement of farm animal health and welfare concerning gut microbiota, and the implication of fecal microbiota transplantation to improve productivity, health, and welfare. Above all, this review suggests that gut microbiota is a promising field to evaluate and improve animal welfare. In the past few decades, farm animal health and welfare have been paid increasing concern worldwide. Farm animal health and welfare are generally assessed by the measurements of physical health, immune response, behavior, and physiological indicators. The gut microbiota has been reported to have a great influence on host phenotypes, possibly via the immune processes, neural functions, and endocrine pathways, thereby influencing host phenotypes. However, there are few reviews regarding farm animals' health and welfare status concerning the gut microbiota. In this point of view, (1) we reviewed recent studies showing that gut microbiota (higher alpha diversity, beneficial composition, and positive functions) effectively influenced health characteristics, immunity, behaviors, and stress response in farm animals (such as pigs, chickens, and cows), which would provide a novel approach to measure and evaluate the health status and welfare of farm animals. In addition, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as one of the methods can modulate the recipient individual's gut microbiota to realize the expected phenotype. Further, (2) we highlighted the application of FMT on the improvement of the production performance, the reduction in disease and abnormal behavior, as well as the attenuation of stress in farm animals. It is concluded that the gut microbiota can be scientifically used to assess and improve the welfare of farm animals. Moreover, FMT may be a helpful strategy to reduce abnormal behavior and improve stress adaption, as well as the treatment of disease for farm animals. This review suggests that gut microbiota is a promising field to evaluate and improve animal welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The gut microbiota in internal medicine: implications for health and disease
    Lankelma, J. M.
    Nieuwdorp, M.
    de Vos, W. M.
    Wiersinga, W. J.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 73 (02): : 61 - 68
  • [32] Gut Microbiota and Gut-Brain Axis in Hypertension: Implications for Kidney and Cardiovascular Health-A Narrative Review
    Mlynarska, Ewelina
    Wasiak, Jakub
    Gajewska, Agata
    Bilinska, Aleksandra
    Stec, Greta
    Jasinska, Joanna
    Rysz, Jacek
    Franczyk, Beata
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [33] An evaluation of "indexing welfare in farm animals
    von Borell, E
    ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL HEALTH, 2002, : 41 - 46
  • [34] The trust window for the welfare of farm animals
    Schouten, Matthijs
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DIERGENEESKUNDE, 2015, 140 (05) : 18 - 18
  • [35] Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare
    Manteuffel, G
    Puppe, B
    Schön, PC
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2004, 88 (1-2) : 163 - 182
  • [36] Assessing the Welfare of Transgenic Farm Animals
    Van Reenen, Cornelis G.
    GENETIC ENGINEERING IN LIVESTOCK: NEW APPLICATIONS AND INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 34 : 119 - 143
  • [37] Biotechnology of reproduction and farm animals welfare
    Kruip, TAM
    van Reenen, CG
    ANIMAL WELFARE AND ANIMAL HEALTH, 2002, : 57 - 62
  • [38] Welfare as a factor in the discharge of farm animals
    Driesse, Monique
    van der Hall, Yvette
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR DIERGENEESKUNDE, 2012, 137 (09) : 606 - 607
  • [39] Food, water and malnutrition: perspectives on nutrient requirements for health and welfare in farm animals
    Lawrence, AB
    Tolkamp, B
    Cockram, MS
    Ashworth, CJ
    Dwyer, CM
    Simm, G
    GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON ANIMAL WELFARE: AN OIE INITIATIVE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 189 - 197
  • [40] Impact of human-animal interactions on the health, productivity and welfare of farm animals
    Hemsworth, P. H.
    SUSTAINABLE ANIMAL PRODUCTION: THE CHALLENGES AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL FARMING, 2009, : 57 - 68