Gut Microbiota Implications for Health and Welfare in Farm Animals: A Review

被引:55
|
作者
Chen, Siyu [1 ]
Luo, Shuyan [1 ]
Yan, Chao [2 ]
机构
[1] Foshan Univ, Sch Life Sci & Engn, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Anim Mol Design & Precise, Foshan 528225, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Lab Lingnan Modern Agr, Genome Anal Lab,Minist Agr,Agr Genom Inst Shenzhe, Shenzhen 518124, Peoples R China
来源
ANIMALS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
farm animal; fecal microbiota transplantation; gut microbiota; welfare; GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT MICROBIOTA; CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE INFECTION; GERM-FREE; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; EARLY-LIFE; FECAL TRANSPLANTATION; IMMUNE DEVELOPMENT; STRESS-RESPONSE; BRAIN; HOST;
D O I
10.3390/ani12010093
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Farm animal health and welfare have been paid increasing concern in the world, which is generally assessed by the measurements of physical health, immune response, behavior, and physiological indicators, such as stress-related hormone, cortisone, and norepinephrine. Gut microbiota as a "forgotten organ" has been reported for its great influence on the host phenotypes through the immune, neural, and endocrine pathways to affect the host health and behavior. In addition, fecal microbiota transplantation as a novel approach is applied to regulating the composition and function of the recipient farm animals. In this review, we summarized recent studies that gut microbiota influenced health, immunity, behavior, and stress response, as well as the progress of fecal microbiota transplantation in farm animals. The review will provide new insights into the measurement of farm animal health and welfare concerning gut microbiota, and the implication of fecal microbiota transplantation to improve productivity, health, and welfare. Above all, this review suggests that gut microbiota is a promising field to evaluate and improve animal welfare. In the past few decades, farm animal health and welfare have been paid increasing concern worldwide. Farm animal health and welfare are generally assessed by the measurements of physical health, immune response, behavior, and physiological indicators. The gut microbiota has been reported to have a great influence on host phenotypes, possibly via the immune processes, neural functions, and endocrine pathways, thereby influencing host phenotypes. However, there are few reviews regarding farm animals' health and welfare status concerning the gut microbiota. In this point of view, (1) we reviewed recent studies showing that gut microbiota (higher alpha diversity, beneficial composition, and positive functions) effectively influenced health characteristics, immunity, behaviors, and stress response in farm animals (such as pigs, chickens, and cows), which would provide a novel approach to measure and evaluate the health status and welfare of farm animals. In addition, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as one of the methods can modulate the recipient individual's gut microbiota to realize the expected phenotype. Further, (2) we highlighted the application of FMT on the improvement of the production performance, the reduction in disease and abnormal behavior, as well as the attenuation of stress in farm animals. It is concluded that the gut microbiota can be scientifically used to assess and improve the welfare of farm animals. Moreover, FMT may be a helpful strategy to reduce abnormal behavior and improve stress adaption, as well as the treatment of disease for farm animals. This review suggests that gut microbiota is a promising field to evaluate and improve animal welfare.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Editorial: Gut microbiota: allied with livestock nutrition, health, and welfare
    Balasubramanian, Balamuralikrishnan
    Liu, Wen-Chao
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2024, 11
  • [22] Coronaviruses in farm animals: Epidemiology and public health implications
    Khamassi Khbou, Mediha
    Daaloul Jedidi, Monia
    Bouaicha Zaafouri, Faten
    Benzarti, M'hammed
    VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SCIENCE, 2021, 7 (02) : 322 - 347
  • [23] Gut microbiota, diet, and health: Application to livestock and companion animals
    Swanson, Kelly S.
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2016, 6 (03) : 4 - 7
  • [24] Gut microbiota, host genetics and phenotypes in aquatic animals: A review
    Gao, Quanxin
    Liu, Peimin
    Li, Yang
    Song, Dawei
    Long, Wei
    Wang, Zefeng
    Yi, Shaokui
    Jiang, Linhua
    AQUACULTURE REPORTS, 2023, 31
  • [25] Gut microbiota and immunity in health and diseases: a review
    Okolie, Michael Chukwuma
    Edo, Great Iruoghene
    Ainyanbhor, Irene Ebosereme
    Jikah, Agatha Ngukuran
    Akpoghelie, Patrick Othuke
    Yousif, Emad
    Zainulabdeen, Khalid
    Isoje, Endurance Fegor
    Igbuku, Ufuoma Augustina
    Orogu, Joshua Othuke
    Owheruo, Joseph Oghenewogaga
    Essaghah, Arthur Efeoghene Athan
    Umar, Huzaifa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY, 2024,
  • [26] Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health
    Cardona, Fernando
    Andres-Lacueva, Cristina
    Tulipani, Sara
    Tinahones, Francisco J.
    Isabel Queipo-Ortuno, Maria
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 24 (08): : 1415 - 1422
  • [27] Ellagic Acid and Gut Microbiota: Interactions, and Implications for Health
    Leng, Pinze
    Wang, Ye
    Xie, Minhao
    FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION, 2025, 13 (04):
  • [28] The ancestral and industrialized gut microbiota and implications for human health
    Erica D. Sonnenburg
    Justin L. Sonnenburg
    Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2019, 17 : 383 - 390
  • [29] The Role of Bacteriophages in the Gut Microbiota: Implications for Human Health
    Emencheta, Stephen C.
    Olovo, Chinasa V.
    Eze, Osita C.
    Kalu, Chisom F.
    Berebon, Dinebari P.
    Onuigbo, Ebele B.
    Vila, Marta M. D. C.
    Balcao, Victor M.
    Attama, Anthony A.
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [30] The ancestral and industrialized gut microbiota and implications for human health
    Sonnenburg, Erica D.
    Sonnenburg, Justin L.
    NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 17 (06) : 383 - 390