Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing

被引:356
|
作者
Gantz, BJ
Turner, C
Gfeller, KE
Lowder, MW
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Roy J & Lucille A Carver Coll Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Iowa City, IA USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Sch Music, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2005年 / 115卷 / 05期
关键词
Hearing Preservation; cochlear implant; hybrid cochlear implant; hearing in noise;
D O I
10.1097/01.MLG.0000157695.07536.D2
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives/Hypothesis. This study documents the importance of preserving residual low-frequency acoustic hearing as those with more residual hearing are selected for cochlear implantation. Surgical strategies used for hearing preservation with a short hybrid cochlear implant are outlined. The benefits of preserved residual low-frequency hearing, improved word understanding in noise, and music appreciation are described. Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, single-subject design. Methods. Records were reviewed of 21 individuals participating in an Food and Drug Administration (FDA) feasibility clinical trial who have received an Iowa/Nucleus 10 mm electrode. A second group of subjects receiving implants at the University of Iowa that have used the 10 mm device between 2 years and 6 months were also reviewed. Outcome measures included standardized tests of monosyllabic word understanding, spondees in noise, and common melody recognition. Results. Low-frequency hearing was maintained in all individuals immediately postoperative. One subject lost hearing at 2.5 months postoperative after a viral infection. The group has averaged a loss of -9 dB low-frequency acoustic hearing between 125 and 1,000 Hz. Monosyllabic word understanding scores at 6 months for a group being followed for an FDA clinical trial using the implant plus hearing aids was 69% correct. For the long-term group receiving implants at Iowa, monosyllabic word understanding in those who have used the device between 6 months and 2 years is 79%. Other important findings include improved recognition of speech in noise (9 dB improvement) as compared with standard cochlear implant recipients who were matched for speech recognition in quiet and near normal recognition of common melodies. Conclusion. The surgical strategies outlined have been successful in preservation of low-frequency hearing in 96% of individuals. Combined electrical and acoustical speech processing has enabled this group of volunteers to gain improved word understanding as compared with their preoperative hearing with bilateral hearing aids and a group of individuals receiving a standard cochlear implant with similar experience with their device. The improvement of speech in noise and melody recognition is attributed to the ability to distinguish fine pitch differences as the result of preserved residual low-frequency acoustic hearing. Preservation of low-frequency acoustic hearing is important for improving speech in noise and music appreciation for the hearing impaired, both of which are important in real-life situations.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 802
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new concept for cochlear implant speech processing
    Leisenberg, M
    Dees, DC
    EAR AND HEARING, 1996, 17 (01): : 69 - 73
  • [32] Application of wavelet in speech processing of cochlear implant
    Guan Tian
    Yu Shuli
    Ye Datian
    2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2005, : 5339 - 5342
  • [33] Hearing preservation with a slim modiolar cochlear implant in a pediatric cohort
    Jimenez, Joaquin E.
    Govil, Nandini
    Shaffer, Amber D.
    Ledonne, Jessica C.
    Chi, David H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 140
  • [34] Effects of Hearing Preservation on Psychophysical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation
    Kang, Stephen Y.
    Colesa, Deborah J.
    Swiderski, Donald L.
    Su, Gina L.
    Raphael, Yehoash
    Pfingst, Bryan E.
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 11 (02): : 245 - 265
  • [35] Outcomes review of modern hearing preservation technique in cochlear implant
    Nguyen, Sally
    Cloutier, Francois
    Philippon, Daniel
    Cote, Mathieu
    Bussieres, Richard
    Backous, Douglas D.
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2016, 43 (05) : 485 - 488
  • [36] Correlation of Electrophysiological Properties and Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Patients
    Dalbert, Adrian
    Sim, Jae Hoon
    Gerig, Rahel
    Pfiffner, Flurin
    Roosli, Christof
    Huber, Alexander
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (07) : 1172 - 1180
  • [37] Effects of Hearing Preservation on Psychophysical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation
    Stephen Y. Kang
    Deborah J. Colesa
    Donald L. Swiderski
    Gina L. Su
    Yehoash Raphael
    Bryan E. Pfingst
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2010, 11 : 245 - 265
  • [38] Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Davis, Timothy J.
    Sunderhaus, Linsey W.
    Menapace, Christine
    Buck, Barbara
    Crosson, Jillian
    O'Neill, Lori
    Beiter, Anne
    Segel, Phil
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (05): : 539 - 553
  • [39] Users' experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid
    Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth Mary
    Seguin, Christiane
    Schramm, David
    Chenier, Josee
    Armstrong, Shelly
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 48 (04) : 172 - 182
  • [40] Spatial Hearing and Speech Intelligibility in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users
    Litovsky, Ruth Y.
    Parkinson, Aaron
    Arcaroli, Jennifer
    EAR AND HEARING, 2009, 30 (04): : 419 - 431