Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:11
|
作者
Saad, Antonio F.
Gavara, Rachana
Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
Goncharov, Arena D.
Berry, Marissa
Eid, Joe
Goldman, Brett
Nutter, Ana
Moutos, Christopher P.
Wang, Amanda M.
Saade, George R.
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Lawrence Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bronxville, NY USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups. RESULTS: From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 590
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening
    Ottinger, WS
    Menard, MK
    Brost, BC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (02) : 349 - 353
  • [32] Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol
    Colon, I
    Clawson, K
    Taslimi, M
    Druzin, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (06) : S15 - S15
  • [33] Prospective randomized clinical trial of inpatient cervical ripening with stepwise oral misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostot
    Colón, I
    Clawson, K
    Hunter, K
    Druzin, ML
    Taslimi, MM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (03) : 747 - 752
  • [34] A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter
    Cromi, Antonella
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Uccella, Stefano
    Agosti, Massimo
    Serati, Maurizio
    Marchitelli, Giulia
    Bolis, Pierfrancesco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 207 (02)
  • [35] Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment:: a randomized clinical trial
    Bartha, JL
    Romero-Carmona, R
    Martínez-Del-Fresno, P
    Comino-Delgado, R
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [36] A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening -: Discussion
    Hardy, J
    Ryder, R
    Ottinger
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 179 (02) : 353 - 353
  • [37] Misoprostol outpatient cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor: A randomized trial
    McKenna, DS
    Ester, JB
    Proffitt, M
    Waddell, KR
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (03): : 579 - 584
  • [38] Corrigendum to A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert (vol 4, 100628, 2022)
    Gupta, Janesh K.
    Maher, Alisha
    Stubbs, Clive
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Daniels, Jane P.
    Hardy, Pollyanna
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (06)
  • [39] Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening -: A randomized trial
    Gherman, RB
    Browning, J
    O'Boyle, A
    Goodwin, TM
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (07) : 641 - 646
  • [40] The Effect of Preinduction Cervical Ripening With Synthetic Hygroscopic Dilators on Maternal Outcomes of Women With Previous Caesarean Pregnancy: A Single-Group Clinical Trial
    Dorairajan, Gowri
    Ravi, Saranya
    Chinnakili, Palanivel
    JOURNAL OF PREGNANCY, 2024, 2024