Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:11
|
作者
Saad, Antonio F.
Gavara, Rachana
Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
Goncharov, Arena D.
Berry, Marissa
Eid, Joe
Goldman, Brett
Nutter, Ana
Moutos, Christopher P.
Wang, Amanda M.
Saade, George R.
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Lawrence Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bronxville, NY USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups. RESULTS: From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 590
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol and osmotic dilator in achieving cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy
    Yu, Dan
    Li, Tin-Chiu
    Xia, Enlan
    Huang, Xiaowu
    GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2006, 3 (03) : 186 - 189
  • [22] Outpatient Versus Inpatient Catheter Balloon Cervical Ripening - A Randomised Trial
    Chen, V.
    Sheehan, P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 : 39 - 40
  • [23] Randomised trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator versus dinoprostone for labour induction
    Gupta, Janesh
    Maher, Alisha
    Stubbs, Clive
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Daniels, Jane
    Hardy, Pollyanna
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 73 - 74
  • [24] Randomized trial of Foley plus prostaglandin gel versus placebo for preinduction cervical ripening
    Pitt, KA
    Phipps, MG
    Blume, J
    Shackelton, R
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (04): : 79S - 79S
  • [25] A prospective, randomized trial of transcervical foley catheter with or without oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Pocock, Sean B.
    Smok, Dorothy P.
    Devine, Patricia C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : S27 - S27
  • [26] Randomized control trial comparing hygroscopic cervical dilators to cervical ripening balloon for outpatient cervical ripening
    Lu, Anjanique Mariquit R.
    Lin, Brenda
    Shahani, Disha
    Demertzis, Kristen
    Muscat, Jolene
    Zabel, Elizabeth
    Olson, Payton
    Manayan, Olivia
    Nonnamaker, Emily
    McCue, Brigid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (04)
  • [27] A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study)
    Wilkinson, C.
    Bryce, R.
    Adelson, P.
    Turnbull, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (01) : 94 - 104
  • [28] Mifepristone for preinduction cervical ripening beyond 41 weeks' gestation: A randomized controlled trial
    Wing, DA
    Fassett, MJ
    Mishell, DR
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (04): : 543 - 548
  • [29] Comparison of outpatient with inpatient mifepristone usage for cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Baev, O.
    Karapetian, A.
    Babich, D.
    Sukhikh, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2023, 18
  • [30] A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial)
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Villarreal, Josephine
    Eid, Joe
    Spencer, Nicholas
    Ellis, Viviana
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Saade, George R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (03) : 275.e1 - 275.e9