Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:11
|
作者
Saad, Antonio F.
Gavara, Rachana
Senguttuvan, Rosemary Noel
Goncharov, Arena D.
Berry, Marissa
Eid, Joe
Goldman, Brett
Nutter, Ana
Moutos, Christopher P.
Wang, Amanda M.
Saade, George R.
机构
[1] Univ Texas Med Branch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Galveston, TX 77555 USA
[2] Lawrence Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bronxville, NY USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2022年 / 140卷 / 04期
关键词
FOLEY CATHETER; LABOR; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether outpatient cervical ripening with a synthetic osmotic dilator shortens the length of hospital stay in term pregnancies undergoing labor induction. METHODS: Pregnant participants scheduled for labor induction at term with unfavorable cervix (less than 3-cm dilated and less than 60% effaced) and not requiring inpatient maternal or fetal monitoring were consented, and synthetic osmotic dilator rods were inserted on the day of scheduled induction. After reassuring fetal heart tracing, patients randomized to the outpatient group were asked to return 12 hours after insertion or sooner if needed. Those randomized to the inpatient group remained in the hospital. After the first round of ripening, additional ripening, oxytocin, and labor management were left up to the clinical health care professionals. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours. We estimated that a sample size of 338 would provide 85% power to detect a 30% difference between groups. RESULTS: From November 2018 to November 2021, 339 participants were randomized (171 inpatient, 167 outpatient, one withdrawal). Four patients in the outpatient group were admitted before12 hours for suspected labor and rupture of membranes, and 19 in the inpatient group had the device removed before 12 hours. The proportion of participants with hospital stays longer than 48 hours was lower in the outpatient group compared with the inpatient group (89 [53%] vs 152 [89%], relative risk [RR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70). Patients in the outpatient group had a shorter total length of stay and time from admission to active labor. They were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours of admission and were less likely to receive analgesics during ripening. Route of delivery and other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cervical ripening with a cervical osmotic dilator decreased hospital stay compared with inpatient ripening, without significant adverse outcomes. FUNDING SOURCE: Medicem Technology s.r.o., Czech Republic.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 590
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient setting: a prospective pilot study of a synthetic osmotic dilator compared with a double-balloon catheter
    Koenigbauer, Josefine Theresia
    Kummer, Julia
    Malan, Marcel
    Simon, Luisa Maria
    Hellmeyer, Lars
    Kyvernitakis, Ioannis
    Maul, Hoger
    Wohlmuth, Peter
    Rath, Werner
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (09) : 946 - 954
  • [2] Cervical Ripening Efficacy of Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Compared With Oral Misoprostol at Term A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gavara, Rachana
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Wapner, RonaldJ
    Saade, George
    Fu, Anne
    Barrow, Ruth
    Nalgonda, Swapna
    Bousleiman, Sabine
    Almonte, Cassandra
    Alnafisee, Sarah
    Holman, Anita
    Burgansky, Anna
    Heikkila, Pekka
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (06): : 1083 - 1091
  • [3] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Outpatient vs Inpatient Cervical Ripening Using Synthetic Osmotic Dilators
    Avritscher, Elenir B. C.
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Han, Xiao
    Saade, George R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2025, 7 (01)
  • [4] Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: A randomized controlled trial
    Meyer, M
    Pflum, J
    Howard, D
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (03): : 466 - 472
  • [5] Buccal Misoprostol Compared With Synthetic Osmotic Cervical Dilator Before Surgical Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bartz, Deborah
    Maurer, Rie
    Allen, Rebecca H.
    Fortin, Jennifer
    Kuang, Bernice
    Goldberg, Alisa B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 57 - 63
  • [6] Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Gupta, Janesh
    Hruban, Lukas
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Saade, George R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 246 : 160 - 164
  • [7] Moving preinduction cervical ripening to a lower acuity inpatient setting using the synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator: a cost-consequence analysis for the United States
    Saunders, Sita J.
    Grisamore, Jody L.
    Wong, Tess
    Torres, Rafael Torrejon
    Saunders, Rhodri
    Einerson, Brett
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 1185 - 1198
  • [8] Transcervical foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting
    Sciscione, AC
    Muench, M
    Pollock, M
    Jenkins, TM
    Tildon-Burton, J
    Colmorgen, GHC
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (05): : 751 - 756
  • [9] Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin
    Fonseca, Linda
    Wood, Hilaire C.
    Lucas, Michael J.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Phatak, Deepali
    Gilstrap, Larry C., III
    Yeomans, Edward R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (03) : 305.e1 - 305.e5
  • [10] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 PREPARATIONS OF VAGINAL PROSTAGLANDIN FOR PREINDUCTION CERVICAL RIPENING
    MURRAY, HG
    BUONOCORE, A
    HAWLEY, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 86 (06): : 880 - 885