The fluorescence quantum yield parameter in Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-Meaning, misperception, and molecular design

被引:20
|
作者
Lindsey, Jonathan S. [1 ]
Taniguchi, Masahiko [1 ]
Bocian, David F. [2 ]
Holten, Dewey [3 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Chem, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Chem, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Chem, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
来源
CHEMICAL PHYSICS REVIEWS | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
RATIONAL DESIGN; PORPHYRINS; PHOTOCHEMCAD; DYNAMICS; BACTERIOCHLORINS; FLUOROPHORES; SUBSTITUENTS; DERIVATIVES; COUMARIN; CHLORINS;
D O I
10.1063/5.0041132
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The fluorescence quantum yield parameter in Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) processes underpins vital phenomena ranging from light harvesting in photosynthesis to design of sensors for monitoring physiological processes. The criteria for choosing a donor for use in FRET processes include chemical features (solubility, bioconjugatability, synthetic accessibility, and stability) as well as photophysical properties pertaining to absorption (wavelength and molar absorption coefficient) and fluorescence (wavelength and fluorescence quantum yield). The value of the donor fluorescence quantum yield (phi f, or emphatically, phi f(D)) alone has sometimes been thought (erroneously) to place a ceiling on the possible quantum yield of energy transfer (phi trans). A high value of the donor phi f, while attractive, is not at all essential; indeed, many valuable candidates for use as FRET donors have likely been excluded on the basis of this injudiciously applied filter. Such disregard is unwarranted. In this tutorial overview, the equations for FRET are reviewed along with pertinent core concepts in photophysics. An analogy using simple hydraulics provides a pedagogical tool for the non-aficionado to better understand photochemical kinetics. Ten examples are presented of donor-acceptor systems with donors that exhibit a range of phi f values (0.60, 0.59. 0.21, 0.17, 0.12, 0.118, 0.04, 0.018, 0.007, and 0.003; i.e., 60%-0.3%), yet for each corresponding donor-acceptor pair, the value of phi trans is at least 0.70 and in some cases nearly 1.00 (i.e., 70%-100%). The systems encompass protein, synthetic inorganic, and synthetic organic architectures. The objectives of this illustrative review are to deepen understanding of FRET and to broaden molecular design considerations by enabling selection from among a far richer set of donors for use in FRET processes. Published under license by AIP Publishing
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SENSOR BASED ON FORSTER RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER WITH QUANTUM DOT
    Liskova, Marcela
    Datinska, Vladimira
    Kleparnik, Karel
    Foret, Frantisek
    CECE 2012: 9TH INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY MEETING ON BIOANALYSIS, 2012, : 303 - 306
  • [32] Simple Estimation of Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Orientation Factor Distribution in Membranes
    Loura, Luis M. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2012, 13 (11): : 15252 - 15270
  • [33] Investigation of Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and Competition of Fluorescent Dyes on DNA Microparticles
    Kim, Jieun
    Lee, Jae Sung
    Lee, Jong Bum
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2015, 16 (04): : 7738 - 7747
  • [34] Targeted Delivery Inside the Cells Directly Visualized with Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
    Zlotnikov, Igor D.
    Belogurova, Natalya G.
    Kudryashova, Elena V.
    POLYMERS, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [35] Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)
    Jovin, TM
    Lidke, DS
    Jares-Erijman, EA
    FROM CELLS TO PROTEINS: IMAGING NATURE ACROSS DIMENSIONS, 2005, 3 : 209 - 216
  • [36] Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) illuminates molecular interactions in focal adhesions of live cells
    Ballestrem, C
    Kirchner, J
    Kam, Z
    Bershadsky, A
    Geiger, B
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2002, 13 : 148A - 148A
  • [37] Flexible Nanoporous Liquid Crystal Networks as Matrixes for Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
    Timmermans, Gilles H.
    van der Heijden, Maxime
    Oosterlaken, Bernette M.
    Meskers, Stefan C. J.
    Schenning, Albert P. H. J.
    Debije, Michael G.
    ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS, 2020, 3 (04) : 3904 - 3909
  • [38] Diffusion-Enhanced Forster Resonance Energy Transfer and the Effects of External Quenchers and the Donor Quantum Yield
    Jacob, Maik H.
    Dsouza, Roy N.
    Ghosh, Indrajit
    Norouzy, Amir
    Schwarzlose, Thomas
    Nau, Werner M.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2013, 117 (01): : 185 - 198
  • [39] Screening for protein-protein interactions using Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)
    Margineanu, Anca
    Chan, Jia Jia
    Kelly, Douglas J.
    Warren, Sean C.
    Flatters, Delphine
    Kumar, Sunil
    Katan, Matilda
    Dunsby, Christopher W.
    French, Paul M. W.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [40] Adaptive optics for a time-resolved Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) in vivo
    Coelho, Simao
    Poland, Simon P.
    Devauges, Viviane
    Ameer-Beg, Simon M.
    OPTICS LETTERS, 2020, 45 (10) : 2732 - 2735