A Bayesian approach to quantifying uncertainty from experimental noise in DEER spectroscopy

被引:58
|
作者
Edwards, Thomas H. [1 ]
Stoll, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Chem, Seattle, WA 98103 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Inverse problem; Tikhonov regularization; MCMC; Statistical inference; DISTANCE MEASUREMENTS; PROTEIN STRUCTURES; ELDOR THEORY; SPIN-LABELS; RESONANCE; REVEALS; ACTIVATION; SPECTRA; BINDING; SERIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmr.2016.06.021
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) spectroscopy is a solid-state pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) experiment that measures distances between unpaired electrons, most commonly between protein-bound spin labels separated by 1.5-8 nm. From the experimental data, a distance distribution P(r) is extracted using Tikhonov regularization. The disadvantage of this method is that it does not directly provide error bars for the resulting P(r), rendering correct interpretation difficult. Here we introduce a Bayesian statistical approach that quantifies uncertainty in P(r) arising from noise and numerical regularization. This method provides credible intervals (error bars) of P(r) at each r. This allows practitioners to answer whether or not small features are significant, whether or not apparent shoulders are significant, and whether or not two distance distributions are significantly different from each other. In addition, the method quantifies uncertainty in the regularization parameter. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bayesian Methods for Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty and Error in Forest Models
    Marcel van Oijen
    Current Forestry Reports, 2017, 3 : 269 - 280
  • [42] Quantifying demographic uncertainty: Bayesian methods for integral projection models
    Elderd, Bret D.
    Miller, Tom E. X.
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2016, 86 (01) : 125 - 144
  • [43] Quantifying uncertainty in brain network measures using Bayesian connectomics
    Janssen, Ronald J.
    Hinne, Max
    Heskes, Tom
    van Gerven, Marcel A. J.
    FRONTIERS IN COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [44] Bayesian Probabilistic Inference of Nonparametric Distance Distributions in DEER Spectroscopy
    Sweger, Sarah R.
    Cheung, Julian C.
    Zha, Lukas
    Pribitzer, Stephan
    Stoll, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2024, 128 (41): : 9071 - 9081
  • [45] A pragmatic Bayesian approach to predictive uncertainty
    Murray, Iain
    Snelson, Edward
    MACHINE LEARNING CHALLENGES: EVALUATING PREDICTIVE UNCERTAINTY VISUAL OBJECT CLASSIFICATION AND RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT, 2006, 3944 : 33 - 40
  • [46] A Bayesian approach for quantification of model uncertainty
    Park, Inseok
    Amarchinta, Hemanth K.
    Grandhi, Ramana V.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (07) : 777 - 785
  • [47] Uncertainty in pose estimation: A Bayesian approach
    Callari, FG
    Soucy, G
    Ferrie, FP
    FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 972 - 976
  • [48] A Bayesian Probabilistic Approach for Quantifying Input-Dependent Uncertainty in Inverter-Fed PMSM Efficiency Modeling
    Guo, Fengxiang
    Chen, Li
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION, 2024, 10 (04): : 8137 - 8149
  • [49] Calibration and quantifying uncertainty of daily water quality forecasts for large lakes with a Bayesian joint probability modelling approach
    Peng, Zhaoliang
    Hu, Yuemin
    Liu, Gang
    Hu, Weiping
    Zhang, Hui
    Gao, Rui
    WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 185 (185)
  • [50] Bayesian NeRF: Quantifying Uncertainty With Volume Density for Neural Implicit Fields
    Lee, Sibaek
    Kang, Kyeongsu
    Ha, Seongbo
    Yu, Hyeonwoo
    IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS, 2025, 10 (03): : 2144 - 2151