Validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire in people on sick leave

被引:8
|
作者
Tingulstad, Alexander [1 ]
Van Tulder, Maurits W. [2 ]
Rysstad, Tarjei [1 ]
Tveter, Anne Therese [1 ,3 ]
Hill, Jonathan C. [4 ]
Grotle, Margreth [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Pilestredet 44, N-0167 Oslo, Norway
[2] Vrije Univ, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Boechorst Str 7-9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Natl Advisory Unit Rehabil Rheumatol, N-0319 Oslo, Norway
[4] Keele Univ, Primary Care Ctr Versus Arthrit, Sch Med, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Res & Commun Unit Musculoskeletal Hlth, PB 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1186/s12955-021-01827-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a recently developed generic questionnaire that consists of 14 items assessing health status in people with musculoskeletal disorders. The objective was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the MSK-HQ into Norwegian and to examine its construct validity and reliability in people on sick leave with musculoskeletal disorders. Methods A prospective cohort study was carried out in Norway on people between 18 and 67 years of age and sick leave due to a musculoskeletal disorder. The participants were recruited through the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration during November 2018-January 2019 and responded to the MSK-HQ at inclusion and after four weeks. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and structural validity with a factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed by eight "a priori" defined hypotheses regarding correlations between the MSK-HQ and other reference scales. Correlations were analyzed by Spearman's- or Pearson's correlation coefficient and interpreted as high with values >= 0.50, moderate between 0.30-0.49, and low < 0.29. Reliability was tested with test-retest, standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results A total of 549 patients, mean age (SD) 48.6 (10.7), 309 women (56.3%), were included. The mean (SD) MSK-HQ sum scores (min-max 3-56) were 27.7 (8.2). Internal consistency was 0.86 and a three-factor structure was determined by factor analysis. Construct validity was supported by the confirmation of all hypotheses; high correlation with HRQOL, psychosocial risk profile, and self-perceived health; moderate correlation with physical activity, self-perceived work ability, and work presenteeism; and low correlation with the number of sick days. The test-retest reliability was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.89), SEM was 2.3 and SDC 6.5. Conclusions The Norwegian version of the MSK-HQ demonstrated high internal consistency, a three-factor structure, good construct validity and good test-retest reliability when used among people on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing physical workload among people with musculoskeletal disorders: validity and reliability of the physical workload questionnaire
    Kjono, Lise Grethe
    Killingmo, Rikke Munk
    Vigdal, Orjan Nesse
    Grotle, Margreth
    Storheim, Kjersti
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [42] The POSNA Pediatric Musculoskeletal Functional Health Questionnaire: Report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change
    Daltroy, LH
    Liang, MH
    Fossel, AH
    Goldberg, MJ
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 18 (05) : 561 - 571
  • [43] Assessing physical workload among people with musculoskeletal disorders: validity and reliability of the physical workload questionnaire
    Lise Grethe Kjønø
    Rikke Munk Killingmo
    Ørjan Nesse Vigdal
    Margreth Grotle
    Kjersti Storheim
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [44] Health-related quality of life in people with overactive bladder symptoms: reliability and validity of the traditional Chinese version of the Kings' Health Questionnaire
    Chiu, Aih-Fung
    Huang, Mei-Huang
    Chiu, Jui-Fang
    Kuo, Hann-Chorng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING, 2013, 7 (03) : 154 - 160
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the brief version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders
    Alsaleh, Saad
    Alfallaj, Rayan
    Almousa, Hisham
    Alsubaie, Nawaf
    Akkielah, Yara
    Mesallam, Tamer A.
    Sumaily, Ibrahim
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 9 (03):
  • [46] Reliability and validity of Portuguese version of the Pain Impact Questionnaire
    Cavalheiro, Luis
    Gil, Joao N.
    Goncalves, Rui S.
    Pacheco, Paula
    Ferreira, Pedro L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 123 - 123
  • [47] The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire
    Duruoz, Mehmet Tuncay
    Toprak, Canan Sanal
    Ulutatar, Firat
    Suhaimi, Anwar
    Agirbasli, Mehmet
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 48 (08): : 731 - 738
  • [48] Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of Leicester cough questionnaire
    Gonen, Nazmiye Akis
    Havlucu, Yavuz
    Yorgancioglu, Arzu
    Goktalay, Tugba
    Coskun, Aysin Sakar
    Celik, Pinar
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2015, 46
  • [49] The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire
    Wittmann Victoria
    Csabai Marta
    Drotos Gergely
    Lazar Gyorgy
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (47) : 1988 - 1993
  • [50] Reliability and validity of Leicester Cough Questionnaire Korean version
    Han, Jong-Min
    Jung, In-Chul
    Kang, Weechang
    Kim, Seung-Su
    Yeo, Yoon
    Park, Yang-Chun
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2014, 11 (03) : 147 - 152