Validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire in people on sick leave

被引:8
|
作者
Tingulstad, Alexander [1 ]
Van Tulder, Maurits W. [2 ]
Rysstad, Tarjei [1 ]
Tveter, Anne Therese [1 ,3 ]
Hill, Jonathan C. [4 ]
Grotle, Margreth [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Pilestredet 44, N-0167 Oslo, Norway
[2] Vrije Univ, Amsterdam Movement Sci Res Inst, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Human Movement Sci, Boechorst Str 7-9, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Natl Advisory Unit Rehabil Rheumatol, N-0319 Oslo, Norway
[4] Keele Univ, Primary Care Ctr Versus Arthrit, Sch Med, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Res & Commun Unit Musculoskeletal Hlth, PB 4950 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1186/s12955-021-01827-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a recently developed generic questionnaire that consists of 14 items assessing health status in people with musculoskeletal disorders. The objective was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the MSK-HQ into Norwegian and to examine its construct validity and reliability in people on sick leave with musculoskeletal disorders. Methods A prospective cohort study was carried out in Norway on people between 18 and 67 years of age and sick leave due to a musculoskeletal disorder. The participants were recruited through the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration during November 2018-January 2019 and responded to the MSK-HQ at inclusion and after four weeks. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha, and structural validity with a factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed by eight "a priori" defined hypotheses regarding correlations between the MSK-HQ and other reference scales. Correlations were analyzed by Spearman's- or Pearson's correlation coefficient and interpreted as high with values >= 0.50, moderate between 0.30-0.49, and low < 0.29. Reliability was tested with test-retest, standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Results A total of 549 patients, mean age (SD) 48.6 (10.7), 309 women (56.3%), were included. The mean (SD) MSK-HQ sum scores (min-max 3-56) were 27.7 (8.2). Internal consistency was 0.86 and a three-factor structure was determined by factor analysis. Construct validity was supported by the confirmation of all hypotheses; high correlation with HRQOL, psychosocial risk profile, and self-perceived health; moderate correlation with physical activity, self-perceived work ability, and work presenteeism; and low correlation with the number of sick days. The test-retest reliability was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.89), SEM was 2.3 and SDC 6.5. Conclusions The Norwegian version of the MSK-HQ demonstrated high internal consistency, a three-factor structure, good construct validity and good test-retest reliability when used among people on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Can we trust the answers? Reliability and validity of self-reported sick leave due to musculoskeletal symptoms
    Laestadius, Jasminka Goldoni
    Ye, Jian
    Dimberg, Lennart
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2008, 50 (06) : 611 - 613
  • [22] The Norwegian version of the American pain society patient outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of three subscales
    Dihle, Alfhild
    Helseth, Solvi
    Christophersen, Knut-Andreas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (15) : 2070 - 2078
  • [23] Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire: Methodological aspects of the Norwegian version
    Grotle, Margreth
    Brox, Jens I.
    Vollestad, Nina K.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (06) : 346 - 353
  • [24] Reliability and validity study of Persian modified version of MUSIC (musculoskeletal intervention center) - Norrtalje questionnaire
    Alipour, Akbar
    Ghaffari, Mostafa
    Jensen, Irene
    Shariati, Batoul
    Vingard, Eva
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2007, 8
  • [25] The Bahasa Melayu version of Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ): Reliability and validity study in Malaysia
    Shariat, Ardalan
    Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri Mohd
    Arumugam, Manohar
    Ramasamy, Rajesh
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2016, 54 (01): : 171 - 178
  • [26] Reliability and validity study of Persian modified version of MUSIC (musculoskeletal intervention center) – Norrtalje questionnaire
    Akbar Alipour
    Mostafa Ghaffari
    Irene Jensen
    Batoul Shariati
    Eva Vingard
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 8
  • [27] Italian Version of the Laval Questionnaire: Validity and Reliability
    Accardi, Roberto
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Racaniello, Emanuela
    Terzoni, Stefano
    Destrebecq, Anne
    BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE, 2017, 12 (03) : 136 - 141
  • [28] Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Epworth sleepiness scale
    Kornelia K. Beiske
    Frank N. Kjelsberg
    Espen A. Ruud
    Knut Stavem
    Sleep and Breathing, 2009, 13 : 65 - 72
  • [29] Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Epworth sleepiness scale
    Beiske, Kornelia K.
    Kjelsberg, Frank N.
    Ruud, Espen A.
    Stavem, Knut
    SLEEP AND BREATHING, 2009, 13 (01) : 65 - 72
  • [30] The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Metacognitions about Health Questionnaire in college students
    Lisha Dai
    Robin Bailey
    Yunlong Deng
    Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 1099 - 1108