Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:71
|
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
来源
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Axial length measurements: Comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer and partial coherence interferometry in myopia
    Yang, Jong Yun
    Kim, Hong Kyu
    Kim, Sung Soo
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (03): : 328 - 332
  • [32] Comparison of axial length using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer - ARGOS with partial coherence interferometry- based biometer -IOLMaster among school children
    Hussaindeen, Jameel Rizwana
    Mariam, Ephrame G.
    Arunachalam, Sushil
    Bhavatharini, Ramakrishnan
    Gopalakrishnan, Aparna
    Narayanan, Anuradha
    Agarkar, Sumita
    Sivaraman, Viswanathan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [33] Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer (vol 47, pg 1302, 2021)
    Fisus, Andreea D.
    Hirnschall, Nino D.
    Ruiss, Manuel
    Pilwachs, Caroline
    Georgiev, Stefan
    Findl, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (06): : 750 - 750
  • [34] Comparison of formula accuracy for intraocular lens power calculation based on measurements by a swept-source optical coherence tomography optical biometer
    Savini, Giacomo
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Balducci, Nicole
    Barboni, Piero
    Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (01): : 27 - 33
  • [35] Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer
    Ruiz-Mesa, Ramon
    Abengozar-Vela, Antonio
    Ruiz-Santos, Maria
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (11): : 1406 - 1412
  • [36] Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer
    Lu, Weicong
    Li, Yue
    Savini, Giacomo
    Song, Benhao
    Hu, Qingjie
    Wang, Qinmei
    Bao, Fangjun
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (03): : 298 - 304
  • [37] Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
    Rongrong Gao
    Hao Chen
    Giacomo Savini
    Yaxin Miao
    Xiaorui Wang
    Jing Yang
    Weiqi Zhao
    Qinmei Wang
    Jinhai Huang
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [38] Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
    Gao, Rongrong
    Chen, Hao
    Savini, Giacomo
    Miao, Yaxin
    Wang, Xiaorui
    Yang, Jing
    Zhao, Weiqi
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [39] Comparison of Ocular Biometric Measurements Using New Swept-source Optical-coherence Tomography, Low-coherence Reflectometry, A-Scan Biometry, and Autokeratometry
    Cho, Jae Jin
    Bae, Gi Hyun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 64 (04): : 287 - 295
  • [40] Comparison of a novel hyper-parallel optical coherence tomography biometer with a swept source OCT biometer in patients with cataracts
    Cherian, Nina
    Al-Hashimi, Saba
    Fung, Simon
    Leyva, Omar
    Tsui, Edmund
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)