Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:71
|
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
来源
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in the anterior segment after cycloplegia with a biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography
    Higashiyama, Tomoaki
    Iwasa, Maki
    Ohji, Masahito
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [22] Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer
    Bao Shu
    Fangjun Bao
    Giacomo Savini
    Weicong Lu
    Ruixue Tu
    Haisi Chen
    Benhao Song
    Qinmei Wang
    Jinhai Huang
    Eye and Vision, 7
  • [23] Effect of orthokeratology on precision and agreement assessment of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer
    Shu, Bao
    Bao, Fangjun
    Savini, Giacomo
    Lu, Weicong
    Tu, Ruixue
    Chen, Haisi
    Song, Benhao
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    EYE AND VISION, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [24] Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
    Chan, Tommy C. Y.
    Yu, Marco C. Y.
    Chiu, Vivian
    Lai, Gilda
    Leung, Christopher K. S.
    Chan, Poemen P. M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [25] Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOL Master
    Savini, Giacomo
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Shammas, H. John
    Aramberri, Jaime
    Huang, Jinhai
    Barboni, Piero
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 33 (10) : 690 - 695
  • [26] Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry
    Li, Junhua
    Chen, Hao
    Savini, Giacomo
    Lu, Weicong
    Yu, Xinxin
    Bao, Fangjun
    Wang, Qinmei
    Huang, Jinhai
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01): : 68 - 75
  • [27] Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer
    Tommy C. Y. Chan
    Marco C. Y. Yu
    Vivian Chiu
    Gilda Lai
    Christopher K. S. Leung
    Poemen P. M. Chan
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [28] Evaluation of crystalline lens and Chock for intraocular lens tilt using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer
    Wang, Li
    de Souza, Rodrigo Guimaraes
    Weikert, Mitchell P.
    Koch, Douglas D.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (01): : 35 - 40
  • [29] Analysis of Crystalline Lens Tilt and Decentration Using a Fully Automated Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    Nilsson, Maria
    Brautaset, Rune
    Venkataraman, Abinaya Priya
    Dominguez-Vicent, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2025, 41 (02) : e155 - e163
  • [30] Reliability of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Healthy Children, Adults, and Cataract Patients
    Huang, Jinhai
    Zhao, Yuyu
    Savini, Giacomo
    Yu, Guanshun
    Yu, Jinjin
    Chen, Zhongxing
    Tu, Ruixue
    Zhao, Yune
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020