Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry

被引:71
|
作者
Hoffer, Kenneth J. [1 ,2 ]
Hoffmann, Peter C. [3 ]
Savini, Giacomo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Marys Eye Ctr, 411 Lincoln Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90402 USA
[3] Augen & Laserklin, Castrop Rouxelle, Germany
[4] GB Bietti Fdn IRCCS, Rome, Italy
来源
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CATARACT PATIENTS; INTERFEROMETRY; FORMULA; ACCURACY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate agreement between the IOLMaster 700 based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and the Lenstar LS 900 based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR). SETTING: Private practice, Castrop-Rouxelle, Germany. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of diagnostic test. METHODS: Axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (corneal epithelium to lens) (ACD), lens thickness, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured in 183 eyes of 183 patients. Analyses used a paired t test, Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and Bland-Altman plots. Intraocular lens (100 power calculations were compared using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRKIT formulas. RESULTS: The difference in the mean AL between SS-OCT and OLCR was statistically significant but clinically insignificant (23.61 mm +/- 1.27 [SD] and 23.60 +/- 1.27 mm, respectively; P<.0001); the agreement and correlation were excellent. The mean K with OLCR was flatter by 0.02 diopter (D) than the mean K with SS-OCT, 43.82 +/- 1.43 diopters (D) and 43.84 +/- 1.43 D, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean ACD with SS-OCT was deeper by 0.03 mm than the mean ACD with OLCR, 3.22 +/- 0.44 mm and 3.19 +/- 0.44 mm, respectively; the difference was statistically significant (P <.001) but clinically insignificant. The differences in the mean lens thickness (OLCR 4.63 +/- 0.44 mm and SS-OCT 4.59 +/- 0.43 mm) and the mean CCT (OLCR 559 +/- 37 mu m and SS-OCT 554 +/- 36 mu m) were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between the median absolute errors of the 3 formulas. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between SS-OCT and OLCR was very good. The clinically insignificant but statistically significant differences in AL, ACD, and lens thickness did not reflect a statistically significant difference in IOL power calculation using 3 third-generation formulas. (C) 2016 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1172
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer
    El Chehab, Hussam
    Agard, Emilie
    Dot, Corinne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05) : 547 - 554
  • [2] Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer
    Arriola-Villalobos, P.
    Almendral-Gomez, J.
    Garzon, N.
    Ruiz-Medrano, J.
    Fernandez-Perez, C.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, J. M.
    Diaz-Valle, D.
    EYE, 2017, 31 (03) : 437 - 442
  • [3] Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer
    P Arriola-Villalobos
    J Almendral-Gómez
    N Garzón
    J Ruiz-Medrano
    C Fernández-Pérez
    J M Martínez-de-la-Casa
    D Díaz-Valle
    Eye, 2017, 31 : 437 - 442
  • [4] Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: Repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device
    Kurian, Mathew
    Negalur, Nikhil
    Das, Sudeep
    Puttaiah, Narendra K.
    Haria, Dhawal
    Tejal, S. J.
    Thakkar, Maithil M.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (04): : 577 - 581
  • [5] Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry
    Higashiyama, Tomoaki
    Mori, Hazuki
    Nakajima, Fumi
    Ohji, Masahito
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [6] Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer
    Dominguez-Vicent, Alberto
    Venkataraman, Abinaya Priya
    Dalin, Amanda
    Brautaset, Rune
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    EYE AND VISION, 2023, 10 (01)
  • [7] Repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and agreement with a low coherence reflectometry biometer
    Alberto Domínguez-Vicent
    Abinaya Priya Venkataraman
    Amanda Dalin
    Rune Brautaset
    Robert Montés-Micó
    Eye and Vision, 10
  • [8] Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer
    Blehm, Clayton
    Hall, Brad
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 17 : 2125 - 2131
  • [9] Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry
    Kunert, Kathleen S.
    Peter, Monika
    Blum, Marcus
    Haigis, Wolfgang
    Sekundo, Walter
    Schuetze, Juliane
    Bueehren, Tobias
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (01): : 76 - 83
  • [10] Ocular measurements of a swept-source biometer: Repeatability data and comparison with an optical low-coherence interferometry biometer
    Nemeth, Gabor
    Modis, Laszlo, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 45 (06): : 789 - 797