Magnetic resonance Imaging of Implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla

被引:62
|
作者
Gimbel, J. Rod [1 ]
机构
[1] Pk W Hosp, Knoxville, TN USA
来源
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker; ICD; electromagnetic interference; safety;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01117.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A relaxation of the prohibition of scanning cardiac rhythm device patients is underway, largely because of the growing experience of safe scanning events at 1.5T. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T is becoming more common and may pose a different risk profile and outcome of MRI of cardiac device patients. Methods: No restrictions were placed on pacemaker dependency, region scanned, device type, or manufacturer. Sixteen scans at 3T were performed with an electrophysiologist present on 14 patients with a variety of devices from various manufacturers. An "MRI-S" strategy was used. Multimodal monitoring was required. Device interrogation was performed prior to, immediately after, and 1-3 months after the MRI. For nonpacemaker-dependent device patients, attempts were made to turn all device features off (with OOO programming the goal) conceptually rendering the device "invisible." In pacemaker-dependent patients, the device was programmed to asynchronous mode at highest output for the duration of the scan with the goal of rendering the device conceptually "invulnerable" to MRI effects. The specific absorption rate (SAR) was limited to 2W/kg. Results: All patients were successfully scanned. No arrhythmias were noted. No significant change in the programmed parameters, pacing thresholds, sensing, impedance, or battery parameters was noted. The insertable loop recorder (ILR) recorded prolonged artifactual asystole during MRI. One patient noted chest burning during the scan. Conclusions: Device patients may undergo carefully tailored 3T MRI scans when pre-MRI reprogramming of the device occurs in conjunction with extensive monitoring, supervision, and follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 801
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and utility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Strom, Jordan B.
    Whelan, Jill B.
    Shen, Changyu
    Zheng, Shuang Qi
    Mortele, Koenraad J.
    Kramer, Daniel B.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2017, 14 (08) : 1138 - 1144
  • [32] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices With Abandoned Leads
    Schaller, Robert D.
    Brunker, Tamara
    Riley, Michael P.
    Marchlinski, Francis E.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Litt, Harold
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 6 (05) : 549 - 556
  • [33] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A prospective study
    Navarro-Valverde, Cristina
    Ramos-Maqueda, Javier
    Jose Romero-Reyes, M.
    Esteve-Ruiz, Irene
    Garcia-Medina, Dolores
    Pavon-Jimenez, Ricardo
    Rodriguez-Gomez, Cristobal
    Leal-Del-Ojo, Juan
    Cayuela, Aurelio
    Molano-Casimiro, Francisco J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 91 : 9 - 15
  • [34] Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Challenges and advantages in clinical neurological imaging
    Frayne, R
    Goodyear, BG
    Dickhoff, P
    Lauzon, ML
    Sevick, RJ
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) : 385 - 402
  • [35] Trends in Utilization of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Stroke Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices
    Culbertson, Collin J.
    Perino, Alexander C.
    Gardner, Rebecca M.
    Balasubramanian, Vidhya
    Vora, Nirali
    NEUROHOSPITALIST, 2022, 12 (04): : 624 - 631
  • [36] Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists Consensus Statement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Verma, Atul
    Ha, Andrew C. T.
    Dennie, Carole
    Essebag, Vidal
    Exner, Derek V.
    Khan, Naeem
    Lane, Chris
    Leipsic, Jonathan
    Philippon, Francois
    Sampaio, Marcos
    Schieda, Nicola
    Seifer, Colette
    Berthiaume, Alain
    Campbell, Debra
    Chakraborty, Santanu
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2014, 65 (04): : 290 - 300
  • [37] Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists Consensus Statement on Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Verma, Atul
    Ha, Andrew C. T.
    Dennie, Carole
    Essebag, Vidal
    Exner, Derek V.
    Khan, Naeem
    Lane, Chris
    Leipsic, Jonathan
    Philippon, Francois
    Sampaio, Marcos
    Schieda, Nicola
    Seifer, Colette
    Berthiaume, Alain
    Campbell, Debra
    Chakraborty, Santanu
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 30 (10) : 1131 - 1141
  • [38] Remote programming of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A novel approach to program cardiac devices for magnetic resonance imaging
    Siddamsetti, Sisir
    Shinn, Alexander
    Gautam, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (05) : 1005 - 1009
  • [39] Considerations for stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices
    Chyou, Janice Y.
    Axel, Leon
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (10) : 2136 - 2138
  • [40] Performing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Contemporary Review
    Blissett, Sarah
    Chetrit, Michael
    Kovacina, Bojan
    Mardigyan, Vartan
    Afilalo, Jonathan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (12) : 1682 - 1686