Magnetic resonance Imaging of Implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla

被引:62
|
作者
Gimbel, J. Rod [1 ]
机构
[1] Pk W Hosp, Knoxville, TN USA
来源
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; pacemaker; ICD; electromagnetic interference; safety;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01117.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A relaxation of the prohibition of scanning cardiac rhythm device patients is underway, largely because of the growing experience of safe scanning events at 1.5T. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T is becoming more common and may pose a different risk profile and outcome of MRI of cardiac device patients. Methods: No restrictions were placed on pacemaker dependency, region scanned, device type, or manufacturer. Sixteen scans at 3T were performed with an electrophysiologist present on 14 patients with a variety of devices from various manufacturers. An "MRI-S" strategy was used. Multimodal monitoring was required. Device interrogation was performed prior to, immediately after, and 1-3 months after the MRI. For nonpacemaker-dependent device patients, attempts were made to turn all device features off (with OOO programming the goal) conceptually rendering the device "invisible." In pacemaker-dependent patients, the device was programmed to asynchronous mode at highest output for the duration of the scan with the goal of rendering the device conceptually "invulnerable" to MRI effects. The specific absorption rate (SAR) was limited to 2W/kg. Results: All patients were successfully scanned. No arrhythmias were noted. No significant change in the programmed parameters, pacing thresholds, sensing, impedance, or battery parameters was noted. The insertable loop recorder (ILR) recorded prolonged artifactual asystole during MRI. One patient noted chest burning during the scan. Conclusions: Device patients may undergo carefully tailored 3T MRI scans when pre-MRI reprogramming of the device occurs in conjunction with extensive monitoring, supervision, and follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 801
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Expanding Access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Patients With Cardiac Rhythm Devices
    Culbertson, Collin J.
    Gold, Carl A.
    JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2018, 75 (10) : 1173 - 1174
  • [22] Cerebral small vessel disease is detectable on 3.0 TESLA magnetic resonance imaging: Established 3.0 TESLA magnetic resonance imaging first time in Mongolia
    Ochirkhuu, Odgerel
    Enkhbat, Tungalag
    Purev, Dulamragchaa
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429
  • [23] 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: A new standard in liver imaging?
    Girometti, Rossano
    WORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 7 (15) : 1894 - 1898
  • [24] 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: A new standard in liver imaging?
    Rossano Girometti
    World Journal of Hepatology, 2015, (15) : 1894 - 1898
  • [25] Vulnerable plaque detection by 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging
    Cury, RC
    Houser, SL
    Furie, KL
    Stone, JR
    Ogilvy, CS
    Sherwood, JB
    Muller, JE
    Brady, TJ
    Hinton, DP
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 112 - 115
  • [26] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: the RESONANCE Spanish registry
    Ruiz Mateas, Francisco
    Perez, Marcos Antonio
    Garcia Lopez, Fernando
    Gonzalez, Susana
    Anguera Camos, Ignasi
    Gusi Tragant, Gabriel
    Robledo Irranitu, Maria
    Fernandez Lozano, Ignacio
    Martinez, Juan Gabriel
    Alzueta Rodriguez, Francisco Javier
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (11):
  • [27] The Safety of Cardiac and Thoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dandamudi, Sanjay
    Collins, Jeremy D.
    Carr, James C.
    Mongkolwat, Pat
    Rahsepar, Amir A.
    Tomson, Todd T.
    Verma, Nishant
    Arora, Rishi
    Chicos, Alex B.
    Kim, Susan S.
    Lin, Albert C.
    Passman, Rod S.
    Knight, Bradley P.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) : 1498 - 1505
  • [28] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 Tesla
    Stab, Daniel
    Al Najjar, Aiman
    O'Brien, Kieran
    Strugnell, Wendy
    Richer, Jonathan
    Rieger, Jan
    Niendorf, Thoralf
    Barth, Markus
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (143):
  • [29] Analysis of cardiac function-comparison between 1.5 tesla and 3.0 tesla cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging - Preliminary experience
    Michaely, HJ
    Nael, K
    Schoenberg, SO
    Laub, G
    Reiser, MF
    Finn, JP
    Ruehm, SG
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [30] Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla - Qualitative and quantitative comparison with 7.5 tesla
    Edelman, RR
    Salanitri, G
    Brand, R
    Dunkle, E
    Ragin, A
    Li, W
    Mehta, W
    Berlin, J
    Newmark, G
    Gore, R
    Patel, B
    Carillo, A
    Vu, A
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 175 - 180