EVALUATING THE MAXIMUM PATIENT RADIATION DOSE IN CARDIAC INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES

被引:16
|
作者
Kato, Mamoru [1 ,2 ]
Chida, Koichi [2 ]
Sato, Tadaya [3 ]
Oosaka, Hajime [1 ]
Tosa, Tetsuo [1 ]
Kadowaki, Ken [3 ]
机构
[1] Akita Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Akita 0100874, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Med, Course Radiol Technol, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808575, Japan
[3] Akita Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Akita 0100874, Japan
关键词
FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED PROCEDURES; SKIN INJURIES; CATHETERIZATION; PHYSICIANS; CARDIOLOGY; EXPOSURE; TIME;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncq286
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many of the X-ray systems that are used for cardiac interventional radiology provide no way to evaluate the patient maximum skin dose (MSD). The authors report a new method for evaluating the MSD by using the cumulative patient entrance skin dose (ESD), which includes a back-scatter factor and the number of cineangiography frames during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Four hundred consecutive PCI patients (315 men and 85 women) were studied. The correlation between the cumulative ESD and number of cineangiography frames was investigated. The irradiation and overlapping fields were verified using dose-mapping software. A good correlation was found between the cumulative ESD and the number of cineangiography frames. The MSD could be estimated using the proportion of cineangiography frames used for the main angle of view relative to the total number of cineangiography frames and multiplying this by the cumulative ESD. The average MSD (3.0 +/- 1.9 Gy) was lower than the average cumulative ESD (4.6 +/- 2.6 Gy). This method is an easy way to estimate the MSD during PCI.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 73
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures
    Padovani, R
    Bernardi, G
    Malisan, MR
    Vañó, E
    Morocutti, G
    Fioretti, PM
    DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIGITAL IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (DIMOND), 2001, : 189 - 192
  • [22] Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures
    Padovani, R
    Bernardi, G
    Malisan, MR
    Vañó, E
    Morocutti, G
    Fioretti, PM
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2001, 94 (1-2) : 189 - 192
  • [23] Estimated patient dose reduction in interventional cardiac procedures using a flat panel digital cardiac imaging system
    Benali, K
    Desponds, L
    Blanc, H
    Klausz, R
    Lumbroso, P
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 5A - 5A
  • [24] Patient radiation dose and lifetime attributable risk of cancer due to ionizing radiation in cardiovascular interventional radiological procedures
    Jamshidi, M. H.
    Keshavarz, A.
    Karami, A.
    Salimi, Y.
    Valizadeh, G. A.
    RADIOPROTECTION, 2022, 57 (02) : 113 - 121
  • [25] Patient Radiation Dose in Diagnostic and Interventional. Procedures for IntracraniaL Aneurysms: Experience at a Single Center
    Chun, Chang Woo
    Kim, Bum-Soo
    Lee, Cheol Hyoun
    Ihn, Yon Kwon
    Shin, Yong-Sam
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (06) : 844 - 849
  • [26] Management of patient radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopy
    Balter, S.
    Egan, M.
    Gonzalez, I.
    Hawkey, M.
    Moses, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2006 - 2007
  • [27] A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures
    McParland, BJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (842): : 175 - 185
  • [28] Patient radiation exposure measurements during interventional procedures
    Efstathopoulos, EP
    Brountzos, EN
    Alexopoulou, E
    Kelekis, DA
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 168 - 168
  • [29] Assessment of Angular Dose Profile for Cardiac and Noncardiac Interventional Procedures
    Ai, H.
    Supanich, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E315 - E315
  • [30] Operator Radiation Dose Reduction During Fluoroscopic Interventional Procedures
    Nachiappan, Arun C.
    Horn, Gag L.
    Spann, Stephanie C.
    Mayo, Ray C.
    Wynne, David M.
    Archer, Benjamin R.
    Whigham, Cliff J.
    Hancock, John A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (05) : 527 - 530