How to overcome barriers limiting LCA adoption? The role of a collaborative and multi-stakeholder approach

被引:9
|
作者
Testa, Francesco [1 ]
Tessitore, Sara [1 ]
Buttol, Patrizia [2 ]
Iraldo, Fabio [1 ]
Cortesi, Sara [2 ]
机构
[1] St Anna Sch Adv Studies, Inst Management, Piazza Martiri Liberta 33, Pisa, Italy
[2] ENEA Italian Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Susta, Lab Valorisat Resources Prod & Terr Syst SSPT USE, Martiri di Monte Sole 4, I-40129 Bologna, Italy
来源
关键词
PEF; SMEs; Collaborative approach; Stakeholders; LCM; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT; DEFINITION; THINKING; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-022-02070-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Companies meet hindrances and difficulties in adopting life cycle assessment (LCA) as a way to identify and assess the environmental aspects of their products and services. Collaborative approaches that are able to involve companies, researchers, trade associations, and other stakeholders can support the organizations in overcoming the LCA barriers by developing common resources. So, the research goal is to demonstrate how the developed collaborative approach enhances the adoption of LCA and product environmental footprint (PEF) in small and medium organizations. The paper presents the results achieved by 15 organizations, operating within five different supply chains, where the collaborative approach was tested. Method The research method we followed in our research is the "action research," focused on the so called "engaged scholarship." Action research is based on a strong cooperation between researchers and practitioners belonging to the organizations involved. It relies on extensive interaction in order to solve a specific problem and generate new knowledge. Results and discussion A cooperative approach was designed and proposed to five supply chains (foundry, furniture, two food chains, and catering services) and in particular to 15 Italian companies that adopted LCA and PEF to improve their environmental performance. Each supply chain tested and internalized the proposed collaborative approach: In partnership with trade associations and researchers, companies participated in training initiatives, contributed to the development of PEF Category Rules, measured the environmental footprint of their products, and adopted improvement actions. Thanks to the action-research experience, all the involved companies achieved environmental improvements such as energy saving and emissions reduction, which demonstrates how the collaborative approach to LCA is effective in terms of footprint reduction. Conclusion The research shows how the proposed collaborative approach can be effective for overcoming the lack of resources and knowledge in LCA adoption. The five supply chains, and 15 organizations involved, had the chance of experimenting "in field" how the LCA can improve both their competitiveness and their environmental performance. The research findings also contribute to the stakeholder engagement theory.
引用
收藏
页码:944 / 958
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Barriers to a Fossil-Free Urban Freight System
    Kervall, Mikael
    Palsson, Henrik
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [42] Designing solutions to challenging the status quo - a multi-stakeholder approach
    Roemer, Carina
    Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn
    David, Patricia
    Kennedy, Ann-Marie
    Domegan, Christine
    Mchugh, Patricia
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL MARKETING, 2025,
  • [43] An Integrated and Multi-Stakeholder Approach for Sustainable Phosphorus Management in Agriculture
    Colombo, Federico
    Pesenti, Michele
    Araniti, Fabrizio
    Pilu, Salvatore Roberto
    Nocito, Fabio Francesco
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [44] Inherent Complexities of a Multi-stakeholder Approach to Building Community Resilience
    Adekola, Josephine
    Fischabcher-Smith, Denis
    Fischabcher-Smith, Moira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (01) : 32 - 45
  • [45] Living Labs - a new multi-stakeholder approach to user integration
    Schumacher, A. J.
    Feurstein, B. K.
    ENTERPRISE INTEROPERABILITY II: NEW CHALLENGES AND APPROACHES, 2007, : 281 - 285
  • [46] Creating learning organization 2.0: a contextualized and multi-stakeholder approach
    Mak, Carry
    Hong, Jacky
    LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2020, 27 (03): : 235 - 248
  • [47] MULTI-STAKEHOLDER APPROACH TO RARE DISEASE CARE IN LATIN AMERICA
    Rico, M.
    Villela, Martinez C.
    Borga, P.
    Salvatierra, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S208 - S208
  • [48] Barriers and facilitators to kinship care in Texas: A Multi-Stakeholder, mixed methods perspective
    Malthaner, Lauren Q.
    Henson-Garcia, Mike
    Conner, Erinne
    Loria, Hilda
    Mcleigh, Jill D.
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2024, 160
  • [49] MULTI-STAKEHOLDER COLLABORATION IN URBAN FREIGHT CONSOLIDATION SCHEMES: DRIVERS AND BARRIERS TO IMPLEMENTATION
    Paddeu, Daniela
    Parkhurst, Graham
    Fancello, Gianfranco
    Fadda, Paolo
    Ricci, Miriam
    TRANSPORT, 2018, 33 (04) : 913 - 929
  • [50] Inherent Complexities of a Multi-stakeholder Approach to Building Community Resilience
    Josephine Adekola
    Denis Fischabcher-Smith
    Moira Fischabcher-Smith
    InternationalJournalofDisasterRiskScience, 2020, 11 (01) : 32 - 45