Improved sampling and analysis of images in corneal confocal microscopy

被引:12
|
作者
Schaldemose, E. L. [1 ]
Fontain, F. I. [1 ]
Karlsson, P. [1 ,2 ]
Nyengaard, J. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Danish Pain Res Ctr, Norrebrogade 44 Bldg 1A, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Core Ctr Mol Morphol, Dept Clin Med, Sect Stereol & Microscopy, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Confocal microscopy; cornea; image quantification; neuropathy; sampling methods; DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; SUBBASAL NERVE PLEXUS; DIAGNOSIS; REPEATABILITY; INDIVIDUALS; TORTUOSITY; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/jmi.12581
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a noninvasive clinical method to analyse and quantify corneal nerve fibres in vivo. Although the CCM technique is in constant progress, there are methodological limitations in terms of sampling of images and objectivity of the nerve quantification. The aim of this study was to present a randomized sampling method of the CCM images and to develop an adjusted area-dependent image analysis. Furthermore, a manual nerve fibre analysis method was compared to a fully automated method. Methods: 23 idiopathic small-fibre neuropathy patients were investigated using CCM. Corneal nerve fibre length density (CNFL) and corneal nerve fibre branch density (CNBD) were determined in both a manual and automatic manner. Differences in CNFL and CNBD between (1) the randomized and the most common sampling method, (2) the adjusted and the unadjusted area and (3) the manual and automated quantification method were investigated. Results: The CNFL values were significantly lower when using the randomized sampling method compared to the most common method (p = 0.01). There was not a statistical significant difference in the CNBD values between the randomized and the most common sampling method (p = 0.85). CNFL and CNBD values were increased when using the adjusted area compared to the standard area. Additionally, the study found a significant increase in the CNFL and CNBD values when using the manual method compared to the automatic method (p <= 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrated a significant difference in the CNFL values between the randomized and common sampling method indicating the importance of clear guidelines for the image sampling. The increase in CNFL and CNBD values when using the adjusted cornea area is not surprising. The observed increases in both CNFL and CNBD values when using the manual method of nerve quantification compared to the automatic method are consistent with earlier findings. This study underlines the importance of improving the analysis of the CCM images in order to obtain more objective corneal nerve fibre measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Efficient System For Preprocessing Confocal Corneal Images For Subsequent Analysis
    Sharif, Mhd Saeed
    Qahwaji, Rami
    Hayajneh, Sofyan
    Ipson, Stan
    Alzubaidi, Rania
    Brahma, Arun
    2014 14TH UK WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (UKCI), 2014, : 265 - 272
  • [42] Corneal Confocal Microscopy in Darier Disease
    Reeves, Graham M. B.
    Kumar, Anupma
    Kaye, Stephen B.
    CORNEA, 2010, 29 (07) : 836 - 837
  • [43] Confocal microscopy in lattice corneal dystrophy
    A. G.-Y. Chiou
    Roger W. Beuerman
    Stephen C. Kaufman
    Herbert E. Kaufman
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1999, 237 : 697 - 701
  • [44] Confocal Microscopy Evaluation of Corneal Grafts
    Navarro, M. C.
    Velasco, R.
    Baca, O.
    Babayan, A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [45] The Utilization of Artificial Intelligence for Corneal Nerve Analyses of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images for the Diagnosis of Neuropathic Corneal Pain
    Koseoglu, Neslihan Dilruba
    Beam, Andrew
    Hamrah, Pedram
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [46] QUANTIFICATION OF CONFOCAL IMAGES OF THE CORNEAL EPITHELIUM
    LAIRD, J
    KAUFMAN, SC
    BEUERMAN, RW
    KAUFMAN, HE
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1994, 35 (04) : 1937 - 1937
  • [47] Automatic analysis of corneal nerves imaged using in vivo confocal microscopy
    Kim, Juno
    Markoulli, Maria
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2018, 101 (02) : 147 - 161
  • [48] Possible sampling error in donor corneal specular microscopy images: a pilot study
    Naves, Obidulho Sakassegawa
    Reis Carvalho, Fabio Ursulino
    Santos de Almeida, Marco Otavio
    da Silva, Andre Ferreira
    Holzchuh, Ricardo
    Hida, Richard Y.
    Abib, Fernando Cesar
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [49] LASIK: Analysis of scattered light profiles of the corneal of confocal microscopy.
    HernandezQuintela, E
    Mayer, F
    Savoldelli, M
    Legeais, JM
    Renard, G
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 1969 - 1969
  • [50] Reliability and reproducibility of corneal endothelial image analysis by in vivo confocal microscopy
    Imre, L
    Nagymihály, A
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 239 (05) : 356 - 360