Improved sampling and analysis of images in corneal confocal microscopy

被引:12
|
作者
Schaldemose, E. L. [1 ]
Fontain, F. I. [1 ]
Karlsson, P. [1 ,2 ]
Nyengaard, J. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Danish Pain Res Ctr, Norrebrogade 44 Bldg 1A, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Core Ctr Mol Morphol, Dept Clin Med, Sect Stereol & Microscopy, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Confocal microscopy; cornea; image quantification; neuropathy; sampling methods; DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; SUBBASAL NERVE PLEXUS; DIAGNOSIS; REPEATABILITY; INDIVIDUALS; TORTUOSITY; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/jmi.12581
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a noninvasive clinical method to analyse and quantify corneal nerve fibres in vivo. Although the CCM technique is in constant progress, there are methodological limitations in terms of sampling of images and objectivity of the nerve quantification. The aim of this study was to present a randomized sampling method of the CCM images and to develop an adjusted area-dependent image analysis. Furthermore, a manual nerve fibre analysis method was compared to a fully automated method. Methods: 23 idiopathic small-fibre neuropathy patients were investigated using CCM. Corneal nerve fibre length density (CNFL) and corneal nerve fibre branch density (CNBD) were determined in both a manual and automatic manner. Differences in CNFL and CNBD between (1) the randomized and the most common sampling method, (2) the adjusted and the unadjusted area and (3) the manual and automated quantification method were investigated. Results: The CNFL values were significantly lower when using the randomized sampling method compared to the most common method (p = 0.01). There was not a statistical significant difference in the CNBD values between the randomized and the most common sampling method (p = 0.85). CNFL and CNBD values were increased when using the adjusted area compared to the standard area. Additionally, the study found a significant increase in the CNFL and CNBD values when using the manual method compared to the automatic method (p <= 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrated a significant difference in the CNFL values between the randomized and common sampling method indicating the importance of clear guidelines for the image sampling. The increase in CNFL and CNBD values when using the adjusted cornea area is not surprising. The observed increases in both CNFL and CNBD values when using the manual method of nerve quantification compared to the automatic method are consistent with earlier findings. This study underlines the importance of improving the analysis of the CCM images in order to obtain more objective corneal nerve fibre measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defining an Optimal Sample Size for Corneal Epithelial Immune Cell Analysis Using in vivo Confocal Microscopy Images
    Zhang, Xin Yuan
    Wu, Mengliang
    Chinnery, Holly R.
    Downie, Laura E.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [32] An efficient intelligent analysis system for confocal corneal endothelium images
    Sharif, M. S.
    Qahwaji, R.
    Shahamatnia, E.
    Alzubaidi, R.
    Ipson, S.
    Brahma, A.
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 122 (03) : 421 - 436
  • [33] Update on Corneal Confocal Microscopy Imaging
    Canadas, Pilar
    Alberquilla Garcia-Velasco, Marta
    Hernandez Verdejo, Jose Luis
    Teus, Miguel A.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [34] Clinical applications of corneal confocal microscopy
    Tavakoli, Mitra
    Hossain, Parwez
    Malik, Rayaz A.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 2 (02): : 435 - 445
  • [35] Corneal Confocal Microscopy and Diabetic Neuropathy
    Patel, Sanjay V.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (09) : 5066 - 5066
  • [36] Classification of corneal layers in confocal microscopy
    Ruggeri, A
    Pajaro, S
    Vita, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4, 2000, 22 : 1030 - 1032
  • [37] Confocal microscopy in lattice corneal dystrophy
    Chiou, AGY
    Beuerman, RW
    Kaufman, SC
    Kaufman, HE
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 237 (08) : 697 - 701
  • [38] In vivo corneal confocal microscopy in keratoconus
    Hollingsworth, JG
    Efron, N
    Tullo, AB
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2005, 25 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [39] Confocal microscopy findings in corneal dytrophies
    Smedowski, A.
    Wylegala, E.
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2016, 94
  • [40] The reliability and reproducibility of corneal confocal microscopy
    Vlckova, E.
    Rajdova, A.
    Nemec, M., Jr.
    Bednarik, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 514 - 514