Improved sampling and analysis of images in corneal confocal microscopy

被引:12
|
作者
Schaldemose, E. L. [1 ]
Fontain, F. I. [1 ]
Karlsson, P. [1 ,2 ]
Nyengaard, J. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Danish Pain Res Ctr, Norrebrogade 44 Bldg 1A, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Core Ctr Mol Morphol, Dept Clin Med, Sect Stereol & Microscopy, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Confocal microscopy; cornea; image quantification; neuropathy; sampling methods; DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY; SUBBASAL NERVE PLEXUS; DIAGNOSIS; REPEATABILITY; INDIVIDUALS; TORTUOSITY; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/jmi.12581
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a noninvasive clinical method to analyse and quantify corneal nerve fibres in vivo. Although the CCM technique is in constant progress, there are methodological limitations in terms of sampling of images and objectivity of the nerve quantification. The aim of this study was to present a randomized sampling method of the CCM images and to develop an adjusted area-dependent image analysis. Furthermore, a manual nerve fibre analysis method was compared to a fully automated method. Methods: 23 idiopathic small-fibre neuropathy patients were investigated using CCM. Corneal nerve fibre length density (CNFL) and corneal nerve fibre branch density (CNBD) were determined in both a manual and automatic manner. Differences in CNFL and CNBD between (1) the randomized and the most common sampling method, (2) the adjusted and the unadjusted area and (3) the manual and automated quantification method were investigated. Results: The CNFL values were significantly lower when using the randomized sampling method compared to the most common method (p = 0.01). There was not a statistical significant difference in the CNBD values between the randomized and the most common sampling method (p = 0.85). CNFL and CNBD values were increased when using the adjusted area compared to the standard area. Additionally, the study found a significant increase in the CNFL and CNBD values when using the manual method compared to the automatic method (p <= 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrated a significant difference in the CNFL values between the randomized and common sampling method indicating the importance of clear guidelines for the image sampling. The increase in CNFL and CNBD values when using the adjusted cornea area is not surprising. The observed increases in both CNFL and CNBD values when using the manual method of nerve quantification compared to the automatic method are consistent with earlier findings. This study underlines the importance of improving the analysis of the CCM images in order to obtain more objective corneal nerve fibre measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of corneal nerve plexus in corneal confocal microscopy images
    Liu, Yu-Chi
    Lin, Molly
    Mehta, Jodhbir S.
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (04) : 690 - 691
  • [2] Analysis of corneal nerve plexus in corneal confocal microscopy images
    Yu-Chi Liu
    Molly Tzu-Yu Lin
    Jodhbir S.Mehta
    Neural Regeneration Research, 2021, 16 (04) : 690 - 691
  • [3] Automated analysis of in vivo confocal microscopy images of corneal nerves
    Misra, Stuti L.
    Oakley, Jonathan D.
    McGhee, Charles N. J.
    Wang, Ellen F.
    Patel, Dipika
    Tarwater, Patrick M.
    Mankowski, Joseph L.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [4] An Improved U-Net for Nerve Fibre Segmentation in Confocal Corneal Microscopy Images
    Zhou, Xinxin
    Chen, Xinjian
    Feng, Shuanglang
    Shi, Fei
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2021, 11313
  • [5] Differential diagnosis of linear corneal images on confocal microscopy
    Chiou, AGY
    Kaufman, SC
    Beuerman, RW
    Ohta, T
    Kaufman, HE
    CORNEA, 1999, 18 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [6] Automated Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Corneal Images Using Deep Learning
    Oakley, Jonathan D.
    Russakoff, Daniel B.
    Weinberg, Rachel
    McCarron, Megan
    Brill, Samuel
    Misra, Stuti
    McGhee, Charles N.
    Mankowski, Joseph
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [7] Automatic recognition of cell layers in corneal confocal microscopy images
    Ruggeri, A
    Pajaro, S
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 68 (01) : 25 - 35
  • [9] Corneal chrysiasis: in vivo confocal microscopy analysis
    Paladin, Iacopo
    Menchini, Ugo
    Mencucci, Rita
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) : 776 - 779