Handling missing data for the identification of charged particles in a multilayer detector: A comparison between different imputation methods

被引:3
|
作者
Riggi, S. [1 ]
Riggi, D. [2 ]
Riggi, F. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Osserv Astrofis Catania, INAF, Catania, Italy
[2] Keras Strategy, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Catania, Dipartimento Fis & Astron, I-95124 Catania, Italy
[4] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Catania, Catania, Italy
关键词
Particle identification; Neural networks; Missing data imputation; Skew-normal mixture; EM algorithm; MAXIMUM; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.063
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Identification of charged particles in a multilayer detector by the energy loss technique may also be achieved by the use of a neural network. The performance of the network becomes worse when a large fraction of information is missing, for instance due to detector inefficiencies. Algorithms which provide a way to impute missing information have been developed over the past years. Among the various approaches, we focused on normal mixtures' models in comparison with standard mean imputation and multiple imputation methods. Further, to account for the intrinsic asymmetry of the energy loss data, we considered skew-normal mixture models and provided a closed form implementation in the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm framework to handle missing patterns. The method has been applied to a test case where the energy losses of pions, kaons and protons in a six-layers' Silicon detector are considered as input neurons to a neural network. Results are given in terms of reconstruction efficiency and purity of the various species in different momentum bins. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of missing data handling methods in cognitive diagnosis: Zero replacement, multiple imputation and maximum likelihood estimation
    Song Zhilin
    Guo Lei
    Zheng Tianpeng
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2022, 54 (04) : 426 - +
  • [22] Comparison of imputation and imputation-free methods for statistical analysis of mass spectrometry data with missing data
    Taylor, Sandra
    Ponzini, Matthew
    Wilson, Machelle
    Kim, Kyoungmi
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [23] A Comparison of Various Imputation Methods for Missing Values in Air Quality Data
    Zainuri, Nuryazmin Ahmat
    Jemain, Abdul Aziz
    Muda, Nora
    SAINS MALAYSIANA, 2015, 44 (03): : 449 - 456
  • [24] Comparison of Estimation Methods for Missing Value Imputation of Gene Expression Data
    Sarikas, Ali
    Odabasioglu, Niyazi
    Altay, Gokmen
    2016 MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES NATIONAL CONFERENCE (TIPTEKNO), 2015,
  • [25] A Comparison of Hot Deck Imputation and Substitution Methods in The Estimation of Missing Data
    Yesilova, Abdullah
    Kaya, Yilmaz
    Almali, M. Nuri
    GAZI UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2011, 24 (01): : 69 - 75
  • [26] Empirical Comparison of Imputation Methods for Multivariate Missing Data in Public Health
    Pan, Steven
    Chen, Sixia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (02)
  • [27] Comparison of Imputation Methods for Missing Rate of Perceived Exertion Data in Rugby
    Epp-Stobbe, Amarah
    Tsai, Ming-Chang
    Klimstra, Marc
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE EXTRACTION, 2022, 4 (04): : 827 - 838
  • [28] Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study
    Marshall, Andrea
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Holder, Roger L.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2010, 10
  • [29] A Comparison of Multiple Imputation Methods for Recovering Missing Data in Hydrological Studies
    Hamzah, Fatimah Bibi
    Hamzah, Firdaus Mohd
    Razali, Siti Fatin Mohd
    Samad, Hafiza
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2021, 7 (09): : 1608 - 1619
  • [30] Comparison of Missing Value Imputation Methods for Malaysian Hourly Rainfall Data
    Mazlan, Noorhafizah
    Rahman, Nurul Aishah
    Deni, Sayang Mohd
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS, 2015, 53 (06): : 209 - 215