Handling missing data for the identification of charged particles in a multilayer detector: A comparison between different imputation methods

被引:3
|
作者
Riggi, S. [1 ]
Riggi, D. [2 ]
Riggi, F. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Osserv Astrofis Catania, INAF, Catania, Italy
[2] Keras Strategy, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Catania, Dipartimento Fis & Astron, I-95124 Catania, Italy
[4] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Catania, Catania, Italy
关键词
Particle identification; Neural networks; Missing data imputation; Skew-normal mixture; EM algorithm; MAXIMUM; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2015.01.063
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Identification of charged particles in a multilayer detector by the energy loss technique may also be achieved by the use of a neural network. The performance of the network becomes worse when a large fraction of information is missing, for instance due to detector inefficiencies. Algorithms which provide a way to impute missing information have been developed over the past years. Among the various approaches, we focused on normal mixtures' models in comparison with standard mean imputation and multiple imputation methods. Further, to account for the intrinsic asymmetry of the energy loss data, we considered skew-normal mixture models and provided a closed form implementation in the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm framework to handle missing patterns. The method has been applied to a test case where the energy losses of pions, kaons and protons in a six-layers' Silicon detector are considered as input neurons to a neural network. Results are given in terms of reconstruction efficiency and purity of the various species in different momentum bins. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Missing Network Data A Comparison of Different Imputation Methods
    Krause, Robert W.
    Huisman, Mark
    Steglich, Christian
    Snijders, Tom A. B.
    2018 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM), 2018, : 159 - 163
  • [2] A comparison of imputation techniques for handling missing data
    Musil, CM
    Warner, CB
    Yobas, PK
    Jones, SL
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2002, 24 (07) : 815 - 829
  • [3] How handling missing data may impact conclusions: A comparison of six different imputation methods for categorical questionnaire data
    Stayseth, Marianne Riksheim
    Clausen, Thomas
    Roislien, Jo
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [4] A comparison of imputation methods for handling missing scores in biometric fusion
    Ding, Yaohui
    Ross, Arun
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2012, 45 (03) : 919 - 933
  • [5] Imputation of missing longitudinal data: a comparison of methods
    Engels, JM
    Diehr, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (10) : 968 - 976
  • [6] Missing traffic data: comparison of imputation methods
    Li, Yuebiao
    Li, Zhiheng
    Li, Li
    IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS, 2014, 8 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [7] Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Dietary Supplement Dosage Data
    Leung, June
    Dwyer, Johanna
    Hibberd, Patricia
    Jacques, Paul
    Rand, William
    JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION, 2010, 20 (05) : 342 - 347
  • [8] A comparison of multiple-imputation methods for handling missing data in repeated measurements observational studies
    Kalaycioglu, Oya
    Copas, Andrew
    King, Michael
    Omar, Rumana Z.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2016, 179 (03) : 683 - 706
  • [9] Comparison of missing data imputation methods using weather data
    Nida, Hafiza
    Kashif, Muhammad
    Khan, Muhammad Imran
    Ghamkhar, Madiha
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 60 (02): : 327 - 336
  • [10] A comparison of imputation methods for the consecutive missing temperature data
    Kim, Hee-Kyung
    Kang, In-Kyeong
    Lee, Jae-Won
    Lee, Yung-Seop
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2016, 29 (03) : 549 - 557