Streaming architectures for cone-beam CT image reconstruction and deformable registration

被引:0
|
作者
Singh, H.
Kandasamy, N.
Folkert, M.
Sharp, G.
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2761696
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop data‐parallel algorithms for tomographic reconstruction and deformable registration within a stream‐processing paradigm, and execute them on cheap stream processors such as graphics processing units (GPUs). Method and Materials: In the computer sciences, the stream‐processing paradigm is emerging as a cost‐effective way of solving large‐scale parallel computing problems. This is due to the recent introduction of high‐performance stream‐processing hardware such as the Cell processor and GPUs—both are commodity stream (or vector) processors, designed specifically to support large‐scale parallel computing on a single chip. This presentation describes how to use the stream‐processing model to significantly accelerate the complex problems of data reconstruction and fusion for radiotherapy. Highly data‐parallel models were developed for: (1) the Feldkamp, Davis, and Kress (FDK) reconstruction algorithm, and (2) Demon's algorithm for optical‐flow based deformable registration. These models were implemented within the Brook programming environment and executed on an nVIDIA 8800 GPU. Results: The performance of GPU‐based implementations of the FDK and Demon's algorithms was analyzed using data obtained from an IGRT testbed of a preserved swine lung. The results indicate a substantial speedup of up to 17 times for FDK, and up to 33 times for Demons, when compared with a 2.4 GHz Intel Duo‐Core processor. In addition, the GPU was found to be capable of high‐quality reconstructions, with differences within a few Hounsfield unit. Conclusions: Results indicate that data‐parallel image‐processing algorithms, when properly designed and executed on a GPU, achieve significant speedup when compared to high‐end desktop CPUs. The acceleration of key data‐processing stages will decrease the time needed to perform image‐guided patient positioning and analysis. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2634 / 2634
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Image reconstruction in reduced circular sinusoidal cone-beam CT
    Xia, Dan
    Cho, Seungryong
    Pan, Xiaochuan
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 17 (03) : 189 - 205
  • [32] Cone-beam CT image reconstruction with extended z range
    Grimmer, Rainer
    Oelhafen, Markus
    Elstrom, Ulrik
    Kachelriess, Marc
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (07) : 3363 - 3370
  • [33] Deformable Registration of MRI to Intraoperative Cone-Beam CT of the Brain Using a Joint Synthesis and Registration Network
    Han, R.
    Jones, C. K.
    Wu, P.
    Vagdargi, P.
    Zhang, X.
    Uneri, A.
    Lee, J.
    Luciano, M.
    Anderson, W. S.
    Helm, P.
    Siewerdsen, J. H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2022, 12034
  • [34] Evaluation of deformable image registration for contour propagation between CT and cone-beam CT images in adaptive head and neck radiotherapy
    Li, X.
    Zhang, Y. Y.
    Shi, Y. H.
    Zhou, L. H.
    Zhen, X.
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2016, 24 : S747 - S755
  • [35] Quantifying the accuracy of deformable image registration for cone-beam computed tomography with a physical phantom
    Wu, Richard Y.
    Liu, Amy Y.
    Williamson, Tyler D.
    Yang, Jinzhong
    Wisdom, Paul G.
    Zhu, Xiaorong R.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Gunn, Gary B.
    Gao, Song
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 20 (10): : 92 - 100
  • [36] The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Artifacts on Deformable Image Registration Algorithms
    Ueda, U.
    Hu, W.
    Pouliot, J.
    Yom, S.
    Quivey, J.
    Aubin, M.
    Chen, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3091 - +
  • [37] Image-based deformable motion compensation for interventional cone-beam CT
    Sisniega, A.
    Capostagno, S.
    Zbijewski, W.
    Weiss, C. R.
    Ehtiati, T.
    Siewerdsen, J. H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [38] Accuracy of radiotherapy dose calculations based on cone-beam CT: comparison of deformable registration and image correction based methods
    Marchant, T. E.
    Joshi, K. D.
    Moore, C. J.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (06):
  • [39] Evaluation of the Performance of Different Deformable Image Registration Algorithms in Helical, Axial and Cone-Beam CT Images of a Mobile Phantom
    Jaskowiak, J.
    Alsbou, N.
    Ahmad, S.
    Ali, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3423 - 3424
  • [40] Deformable Image Registration in the Presence of Excised Tissue: A Modified Demons Algorithm for Cone-Beam CT-Guided Surgery
    Nithiananthan, S.
    Schafer, S.
    Mirota, D. J.
    Uneri, A.
    Otake, Y.
    Stayman, J. W.
    Siewerdsen, J. H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06) : 3452 - +