State-of-the-science review of leader-follower dyads research

被引:44
|
作者
Kim, Jayoung [1 ]
Yammarino, Francis J. [1 ,2 ]
Dionne, Shelley D. [1 ,2 ]
Eckardt, Rory [1 ,2 ]
Cheong, Minyoung [3 ]
Tsai, Chou-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Park, Jin Won [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Bass Ctr Leadership Studies, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Sch Management, Binghamton, NY 13901 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Sch Grad Profess Studies Great Valley, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY | 2020年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
Leader-follower dyads; Dyadic theories; Dyadic methods; Nomological network of leader-follower dyadic relationships; MEMBER EXCHANGE LMX; SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE DYADS; CONTINGENT REWARD LEADERSHIP; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE RATINGS; ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH; EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; PERSON-ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101306
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite its importance in multilevel research, the dyad level of analysis has been known as the most poorly understood level. Suggestions have been made recently in terms of levels alignment issues and methodologies to enhance the understanding of dyadic phenomena. Given recent remedies for dyads research and that the leader-follower dyad is generally considered the key dyad in organizations, we conducted a comprehensive review of the current state of leader-follower dyads research to assess what we know and how much we know about leader-follower dyads research conducted at the dyad level. Specifically, we summarized empirical studies that focused on leader-follower dyads that used data collected on the same variables from both dyadic partners. This review involved coding studies of these "pure" leader-follower dyads based on several dyadic theories (e.g., vertical dyad linkage, individualized leadership, leader-member exchange, leader-follower congruence) and multiple analytic methods (e.g., multilevel modeling, polynomial regression, WABA) that dealt with leader-follower dyads directly. Based on the results, this review generated a nomological network of constructs for understanding leader-follower dyads and to provide suggestions for future leader-follower dyads research.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Leader-follower transgressions, relationship repair strategies and outcomes: A state-of-the-science review and a way forward
    Epitropaki, Olga
    Radulovic, Ana B.
    Ete, Ziya
    Thomas, Geoff
    Martin, Robin
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2020, 31 (01):
  • [2] An examination of exchange quality and work stressors in leader-follower dyads
    Nelson, D
    Basu, R
    Purdie, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 1998, 5 (02) : 103 - 112
  • [3] Personalities in sync: The covariation of psychological resources in leader-follower dyads
    Doci, Edina
    Hofmans, Joeri
    Judge, Timothy A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2021, 35 (04) : 466 - 479
  • [4] 2-WAY INFLUENCE PROCESSES IN LEADER-FOLLOWER DYADS
    HEROLD, DM
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1977, 20 (02): : 224 - 237
  • [5] Leader-Follower Role Allocation for Physical Collaboration in Human Dyads
    Leskovar, Rebeka Kropivsek
    Camernik, Jernej
    Petric, Tadej
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (19):
  • [6] Analyzing hospitality leader-follower dyads with polynomial regression: a critical reflection
    Shi, Xiaolin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 35 (08) : 2968 - 2982
  • [7] The double-edged sword of helping behavior in leader-follower dyads
    Hoption, Colette
    LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (01) : 13 - 41
  • [8] THE LEADER-FOLLOWER RELATIONSHIP
    STEPHENSON, TE
    SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1959, 7 (02): : 179 - 195
  • [9] The leader-follower relationship
    Fire Department, Roseville, MN
    Fire Eng, 2006, 7 (12-16):
  • [10] Beyond relationship quality: The role of leader-member exchange importance in leader-follower dyads
    Lee, Allan
    Thomas, Geoff
    Martin, Robin
    Guillaume, Yves
    Marstand, Anders F.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 92 (04) : 736 - 763