Analyzing hospitality leader-follower dyads with polynomial regression: a critical reflection

被引:3
|
作者
Shi, Xiaolin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Hotel & Tourism Management, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Polynomial regression analysis; Response surface method; Dyadic relationships; Hospitality management; PERSON-ORGANIZATION; CONSEQUENCES; BEHAVIOR; FIT;
D O I
10.1108/IJCHM-05-2022-0588
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeCongruence serves as a key framework in many leader-follower dyad theories. This paper aims to introduce polynomial regression analysis with response surface methodology (PRA with RSM) as a statistical technique for investigating research questions concerning leader-follower dyadic relationships in the hospitality context. Design/methodology/approachFirst, this paper illustrates the necessity of applying PRA with RSM to more effectively address the research issues related to leader-follower dyadic relationships. Next, this paper presents an overview and the key concepts of PRA with RSM. Critical issues that need to be noted and two recent hospitality leadership studies that have used PRA with RSM are discussed. Third, an empirical example in the hotel context is provided to illustrate the application of PRA with RSM. FindingsBy applying this methodology to the study of hospitality leader-follower dyadic relationships, researchers will be able to address a range of topics related to dyadic theory, such as leader-member exchange and value congruence. Practical implicationsPRA with RSM reveals that congruence effects vary within leader-follower dyads. Industry professionals can promote a better leader-follower fit by incorporating dyadic surveys to understand mutual agreement and perceptions regarding same-workplace phenomena. Originality/valueThe paper addresses the misalignment between leader-follower dyadic theory and the methodology used in hospitality leadership studies.
引用
收藏
页码:2968 / 2982
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Leader-Follower Congruence in MD Propensity and UPB: A Polynomial Regression Analysis
    Song, Jun
    Yang, Jin
    He, Changqing
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 155 (03): : 275 - 291
  • [2] Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work engagement: A polynomial regression analysis
    Yang, Kejian
    Yan, Xiaofei
    Fan, Jieyi
    Luo, Zhengxue
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 105 : 43 - 46
  • [3] Personalities in sync: The covariation of psychological resources in leader-follower dyads
    Doci, Edina
    Hofmans, Joeri
    Judge, Timothy A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2021, 35 (04) : 466 - 479
  • [4] An examination of exchange quality and work stressors in leader-follower dyads
    Nelson, D
    Basu, R
    Purdie, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 1998, 5 (02) : 103 - 112
  • [5] LEADER-FOLLOWER VALUE CONGRUENCE IN SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICAL SATISFACTION: A POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION ANALYSIS
    Kang, Seung-Wan
    Byun, Gukdo
    Park, Hun-Joon
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2014, 115 (03) : 725 - 740
  • [6] 2-WAY INFLUENCE PROCESSES IN LEADER-FOLLOWER DYADS
    HEROLD, DM
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1977, 20 (02): : 224 - 237
  • [7] State-of-the-science review of leader-follower dyads research
    Kim, Jayoung
    Yammarino, Francis J.
    Dionne, Shelley D.
    Eckardt, Rory
    Cheong, Minyoung
    Tsai, Chou-Yu
    Guo, Jie
    Park, Jin Won
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2020, 31 (01):
  • [8] Leader-Follower Role Allocation for Physical Collaboration in Human Dyads
    Leskovar, Rebeka Kropivsek
    Camernik, Jernej
    Petric, Tadej
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (19):
  • [9] The double-edged sword of helping behavior in leader-follower dyads
    Hoption, Colette
    LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (01) : 13 - 41
  • [10] Beyond relationship quality: The role of leader-member exchange importance in leader-follower dyads
    Lee, Allan
    Thomas, Geoff
    Martin, Robin
    Guillaume, Yves
    Marstand, Anders F.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 92 (04) : 736 - 763