State-of-the-science review of leader-follower dyads research

被引:44
|
作者
Kim, Jayoung [1 ]
Yammarino, Francis J. [1 ,2 ]
Dionne, Shelley D. [1 ,2 ]
Eckardt, Rory [1 ,2 ]
Cheong, Minyoung [3 ]
Tsai, Chou-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Park, Jin Won [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Bass Ctr Leadership Studies, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Sch Management, Binghamton, NY 13901 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Sch Grad Profess Studies Great Valley, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY | 2020年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
Leader-follower dyads; Dyadic theories; Dyadic methods; Nomological network of leader-follower dyadic relationships; MEMBER EXCHANGE LMX; SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE DYADS; CONTINGENT REWARD LEADERSHIP; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; RELATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE RATINGS; ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH; EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; PERSON-ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101306
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite its importance in multilevel research, the dyad level of analysis has been known as the most poorly understood level. Suggestions have been made recently in terms of levels alignment issues and methodologies to enhance the understanding of dyadic phenomena. Given recent remedies for dyads research and that the leader-follower dyad is generally considered the key dyad in organizations, we conducted a comprehensive review of the current state of leader-follower dyads research to assess what we know and how much we know about leader-follower dyads research conducted at the dyad level. Specifically, we summarized empirical studies that focused on leader-follower dyads that used data collected on the same variables from both dyadic partners. This review involved coding studies of these "pure" leader-follower dyads based on several dyadic theories (e.g., vertical dyad linkage, individualized leadership, leader-member exchange, leader-follower congruence) and multiple analytic methods (e.g., multilevel modeling, polynomial regression, WABA) that dealt with leader-follower dyads directly. Based on the results, this review generated a nomological network of constructs for understanding leader-follower dyads and to provide suggestions for future leader-follower dyads research.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Like Leader, Like Follower: Impact of Leader-Follower Identification Transfer on Follower Outcomes
    Ishaq, Erum
    Bouckenooghe, Dave
    Zakariya, Ramsha
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 657 - 670
  • [22] Research of consistency problem for quadrotor UAV system with leader-follower
    Yu, Jimin
    Yan, Chuanyou
    Huang, Mei
    2019 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC2019), 2019, : 616 - 621
  • [23] LEADER LEGITIMACY, LEADER-FOLLOWER INTERACTION, AND FOLLOWERS RATINGS OF THE LEADER
    BENYOAV, O
    HOLLANDER, EP
    CARNEVALE, PJD
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 121 (01): : 111 - 115
  • [24] Leader Selection via the Manipulability of Leader-Follower Networks
    Kawashima, Hiroaki
    Egerstedt, Magnus
    2012 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2012, : 6053 - 6058
  • [25] Vulnerability and trust in leader-follower relationships
    Nienaber, Ann-Marie
    Hofeditz, Marcel
    Romeike, Philipp Daniel
    PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2015, 44 (04) : 567 - 591
  • [26] Leader-follower synchronization with disturbance rejection
    Paliotta, Claudio
    Pettersen, Kristin Y.
    2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON CONTROL APPLICATIONS (CCA), 2016,
  • [27] Leader-follower controllability of signed networks
    Liu, Bo
    An, Qing
    Gao, Yanping
    Su, Housheng
    ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2022, 128 : 115 - 122
  • [28] DISTRIBUTED LEADER-FOLLOWER FLOCKING CONTROL
    Wang, Zongyao
    Gu, Dongbing
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2009, 11 (04) : 396 - 406
  • [29] Leader-Follower Formation Control for Quadrotors
    Wu, Falin
    Chen, Jiemin
    Liang, Yuan
    2016 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL AND AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (ICMAE 2016), 2017, 187
  • [30] Robustness analysis of leader-follower consensus
    Jinzhi Wang
    Ying Tan
    Iven Mareels
    Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2009, 22 : 186 - 206