An assessment of the quality of optical coherence tomography image acquisition

被引:5
|
作者
Zago, Elder Iarossi [1 ]
Samdani, Abdul Jawwad [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriel Tensol Rodrigues [1 ]
Vergara-Martel, Armando [1 ]
Alaiti, Mohamad Amer [2 ,3 ]
Dallan, Luis Augusto [1 ]
Pizzato, Patricia Ely [1 ]
Zimin, Vladislav [1 ]
Fares, Anas [1 ]
Bezerra, Hiram G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Cleveland Med Ctr, Harrington Heart & Vasc Inst, Cardiovasc Imaging Core Lab, 11100 Euclid Ave,Lakeside Bldg,Room 3113, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX USA
[3] VA North Texas Healthcare Syst, Dallas, TX USA
来源
关键词
Image acquisition; Optical coherence tomography; Intravascular imaging; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT DEXTRAN; GUIDE DECISION-MAKING; CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS; DOCUMENT; SAFETY; OPTIMIZATION; FEASIBILITY; TERMINOLOGY; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10554-020-01795-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides excellent image resolution, however OCT optimal acquisition is essential but could be challenging owing to several factors. We sought to assess the quality of OCT pullbacks and identify the causes of suboptimal image acquisition. We evaluated 784 (404 pre-PCI; 380 post-PCI) coronary pullbacks from an anonymized OCT database from our Cardiovascular Imaging Core Laboratory. Imaging of the region-of-interest (ROI-lesion or stented segment plus references) was incomplete in 16.1% pullbacks, caused by pullback starting too proximal (63.7%), inappropriate pullback length (17.1%) and pullback starting too distal (11.4%). The quality of image acquisition was excellent in 36.3% pullbacks; whereas 4% pullbacks were unanalyzable. Pullback quality was most commonly affected by poor blood displacement from inadequate contrast volume (27.4%) or flow (25.6%), followed by artifacts (24.1%). Acquisition mode was 'High-Resolution' (54 mm) in 74.4% and 'Survey' (75 mm) in 25.6% of cases. The 54 mm mode was associated with incomplete ROI imaging (p = 0.020) and inadequate contrast volume (p = 0.035). We observed a substantial frequency of suboptimal image acquisition and identified its causes, most of which can be addressed with minor modifications during the procedure, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1020
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reconstruction of optical coherence tomography image
    Sun, Fei
    Xue, Ping
    Gao, Jianshong
    Yuan, Tao
    Chen, Dieyan
    Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica, 2000, 20 (08): : 1043 - 1046
  • [32] Optical coherence tomography for quality assessment of embedded microchannels in alumina ceramic
    Su, Rong
    Kirillin, Mikhail
    Ekberg, Peter
    Roos, Arne
    Sergeeva, Ekaterina
    Mattsson, Lars
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2012, 20 (04): : 4603 - 4618
  • [33] Deep learning for quality assessment of optical coherence tomography angiography images
    Dhodapkar, Rahul M.
    Li, Emily
    Nwanyanwu, Kristen
    Adelman, Ron
    Krishnaswamy, Smita
    Wang, Jay C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [34] Deep learning for quality assessment of optical coherence tomography angiography images
    Wang, Jay C.
    Dhodapkar, Rahul
    Li, Emily
    Nwanyanwu, Kristen Harris
    Adelman, Ron A.
    Krishnaswamy, Smita
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [35] A machine learning method for optical coherence tomography scan quality assessment
    Elezaby, Shereen
    Bagherinia, Homayoun
    Ren, Hugang
    Sha, Patricia
    Tracewell, Laura
    Wu, Charles
    Fard, Ali
    Durbin, Mary
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (09)
  • [36] Deep learning for quality assessment of optical coherence tomography angiography images
    Rahul M. Dhodapkar
    Emily Li
    Kristen Nwanyanwu
    Ron Adelman
    Smita Krishnaswamy
    Jay C. Wang
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [37] Quality assessment for spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) images
    Liu, Shuang
    Paranjape, Amit S.
    Elmaanaoui, Badr
    Dewelle, Jordan
    Rylander, H. Grady, III
    Markey, Mia K.
    Milner, Thomas E.
    MULTIMODAL BIOMEDICAL IMAGING IV, 2009, 7171
  • [38] Deep learning-based image quality assessment for optical coherence tomography macular scans: a multicentre study
    Tang, Ziqi
    Wang, Xi
    Ran, An Ran
    Yang, Dawei
    Ling, Anni
    Yam, Jason C.
    Zhang, Xiujuan
    Szeto, Simon K. H.
    Chan, Jason
    Wong, Cherie Y. K.
    Hui, Vivian W. K.
    Chan, Carmen K. M.
    Wong, Tien Yin
    Cheng, Ching-Yu
    Sabanayagam, Charumathi
    Tham, Yih Chung
    Liew, Gerald
    Anantharaman, Giridhar
    Raman, Rajiv
    Cai, Yu
    Che, Haoxuan
    Luo, Luyang
    Liu, Quande
    Wong, Yiu Lun
    Ngai, Amanda K. Y.
    Yuen, Vincent L.
    Kei, Nelson
    Lai, Timothy Y. Y.
    Chen, Hao
    Tham, Clement C.
    Heng, Pheng-Ann
    Cheung, Carol Y.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 108 (11) : 1555 - 1563
  • [39] Clinical validation of the RTVue optical coherence tomography angiography image quality indicators
    Ali, Noha
    Sampson, Danuta M.
    Yong, Alex Au
    Jeewa, Rumaanah
    Rajgopal, Saumya
    Dutt, Deepaysh D. C. S.
    Mohamed, Sharaf
    Mohamed, Shehata
    Menghini, Moreno
    Hansen, Alex
    Chen, Fred K.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 48 (02): : 192 - 203
  • [40] A Novel Image Quality Metrice for Evaluation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images of Skin
    Babaee, Elnaz
    Lukas, Brandon
    May, Julia
    Charmi, Mostafa
    Avanaki, Kamran
    PHOTONICS IN DERMATOLOGY AND PLASTIC SURGERY 2022, 2022, 11934