Inelastic condensed dynamic models for estimating seismic demands for buildings

被引:13
|
作者
Tehrani, M. H. [1 ]
Harvey, P. S., Jr. [1 ]
Gavin, H. P. [2 ]
Mirza, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, 202 W Boyd St, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model reduction; Hysteresis; Seismic demand; Response history analysis; Bouc-Wen model; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PROCEDURE; DAMAGE DETECTION; RANDOM VIBRATION; REDUCTION; RESPONSES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.083
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Computationally-efficient simulations of structural responses, such as displacements and inter-story drift ratios, are central to performance-based earthquake engineering. Calculating these responses involves potentially time-consuming response history analysis of inelastic structural behavior. To overcome this burden, this paper introduces a new inelastic model condensation (IMC) procedure. The method presented here is non-iterative and uses the modal properties of the full model (in the elastic range) to condense the structural model such that the condensed elastic model preserves the modal properties of the full model at certain modes specified by the analyst. Then, by replacing the inter-story elastic forces with hysteretic forces, the inelastic behavior of the full finite element model is incorporated into the condensed model. The parameters of these hysteretic forces are easily tuned, in order to fit the inelastic behavior of the condensed structure to that of the full model under a variety of simple loading scenarios. The fidelity of structural models condensed in this way is demonstrated via simulation for different ground motion intensities on three different building structures with various heights. The simplicity, accuracy, and efficiency of this approach could significantly alleviate the computational burden of performance-based earthquake engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 629
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems
    Ramirez, OM
    Constantinou, MC
    Whittaker, AS
    Kircher, CA
    Chrysostomou, CZ
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2002, 18 (03) : 531 - 547
  • [32] SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH INELASTIC FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS
    KUNNATH, SK
    PANAHSHAHI, N
    REINHORN, AM
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1991, 117 (04): : 1218 - 1237
  • [33] Inelastic response of RC frame buildings with seismic isolation
    Cardone, Donatello
    Flora, Amedeo
    Gesualdi, Giuseppe
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (06): : 871 - 889
  • [34] THE STRUCTURAL FUSE - AN INELASTIC APPROACH TO SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS
    FINTEL, M
    GHOSH, SK
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1981, 51 (01): : 48 - 51
  • [35] Method for estimating seismic behavior of buildings and bridges
    Fajfar, P.
    Fischinger, M.
    Isakovic, T.
    Gradevinar, 2000, 52 (11): : 663 - 671
  • [36] Simplified dynamic inelastic analysis of tall buildings
    Ju, Y. K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-STRUCTURES AND BUILDINGS, 2006, 159 (03) : 165 - 178
  • [37] Cyclic Pushover Analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings
    Panyakapo, Phaiboon
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 66 : 10 - 23
  • [38] Determination of inelastic seismic demands of RC moment resisting setback frames
    Varadharajan, S.
    Sehgal, V. K.
    Saini, Babita
    ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 13 (03) : 370 - 393
  • [39] Estimation of inelastic seismic deformations in asymmetric multistorey RC buildings
    Kosmopoulos, A. J.
    Fardis, M. N.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (09): : 1209 - 1234
  • [40] INFLUENCE OF ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY ON INELASTIC SEISMIC TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN BUILDINGS
    CHANDLER, AM
    CORRENZA, JC
    HUTCHINSON, GL
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1995, 17 (03) : 167 - 178