Inelastic condensed dynamic models for estimating seismic demands for buildings

被引:13
|
作者
Tehrani, M. H. [1 ]
Harvey, P. S., Jr. [1 ]
Gavin, H. P. [2 ]
Mirza, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, 202 W Boyd St, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model reduction; Hysteresis; Seismic demand; Response history analysis; Bouc-Wen model; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PROCEDURE; DAMAGE DETECTION; RANDOM VIBRATION; REDUCTION; RESPONSES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.083
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Computationally-efficient simulations of structural responses, such as displacements and inter-story drift ratios, are central to performance-based earthquake engineering. Calculating these responses involves potentially time-consuming response history analysis of inelastic structural behavior. To overcome this burden, this paper introduces a new inelastic model condensation (IMC) procedure. The method presented here is non-iterative and uses the modal properties of the full model (in the elastic range) to condense the structural model such that the condensed elastic model preserves the modal properties of the full model at certain modes specified by the analyst. Then, by replacing the inter-story elastic forces with hysteretic forces, the inelastic behavior of the full finite element model is incorporated into the condensed model. The parameters of these hysteretic forces are easily tuned, in order to fit the inelastic behavior of the condensed structure to that of the full model under a variety of simple loading scenarios. The fidelity of structural models condensed in this way is demonstrated via simulation for different ground motion intensities on three different building structures with various heights. The simplicity, accuracy, and efficiency of this approach could significantly alleviate the computational burden of performance-based earthquake engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 629
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF TURBINE BUILDINGS.
    Hsiu, F.J.
    Hanson, R.D.
    1600, Commun of the Eur Communities, Luxemb (K(a)):
  • [22] EFFECTIVE ECCENTRICITY FOR INELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE OF BUILDINGS
    TSO, WK
    BOZORGNIA, Y
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1986, 14 (03): : 413 - 427
  • [23] An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings
    Jan, TS
    Liu, MW
    Kao, YC
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2004, 26 (01) : 117 - 128
  • [24] An improved consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands of multi-storey framed buildings
    Zhang, Jing-Zhou
    Jiang, Jian
    Li, Guo-Qiang
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2017, 26 (04):
  • [25] Estimation of inelastic deformation demands in multistorey RC frame buildings
    Panagiotakos, TB
    Fardis, MN
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1999, 28 (05): : 501 - 528
  • [26] Evaluation of predictors of non-linear seismic demands using 'fishbone' models of SMRF buildings
    Luco, N
    Mori, Y
    Funahashi, Y
    Cornell, CA
    Nakashima, M
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2003, 32 (14): : 2267 - 2288
  • [27] SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS BY THE DYNAMIC METHOD USED THREE DIFFERENT MODELS
    Luevanos Rojas, Arnulfo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 9 (11): : 4303 - 4320
  • [28] Seismic design of buildings by the dynamic method used three different models
    Rojas, A. L. (arnulfol_2007@hotmail.com), 1600, IJICIC Editorial Office, 9-1-1 Toroku, Kamamoto, 862 8652, Japan (09):
  • [29] Approximate seismic lateral deformation demands in multistory buildings
    Miranda, E
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1999, 125 (04): : 417 - 425
  • [30] Seismic structural demands and inelastic deformation ratios: a theoretical approach
    Chikh, Benazouz
    Mebarki, Ahmed
    Laouami, Nacer
    Leblouba, Moussa
    Mehani, Youcef
    Hadid, Mohamed
    Kibboua, Abderrahmane
    Benouar, Djilali
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 12 (04) : 397 - 407