Inelastic condensed dynamic models for estimating seismic demands for buildings

被引:13
|
作者
Tehrani, M. H. [1 ]
Harvey, P. S., Jr. [1 ]
Gavin, H. P. [2 ]
Mirza, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, 202 W Boyd St, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Model reduction; Hysteresis; Seismic demand; Response history analysis; Bouc-Wen model; PUSHOVER ANALYSIS PROCEDURE; DAMAGE DETECTION; RANDOM VIBRATION; REDUCTION; RESPONSES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.083
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Computationally-efficient simulations of structural responses, such as displacements and inter-story drift ratios, are central to performance-based earthquake engineering. Calculating these responses involves potentially time-consuming response history analysis of inelastic structural behavior. To overcome this burden, this paper introduces a new inelastic model condensation (IMC) procedure. The method presented here is non-iterative and uses the modal properties of the full model (in the elastic range) to condense the structural model such that the condensed elastic model preserves the modal properties of the full model at certain modes specified by the analyst. Then, by replacing the inter-story elastic forces with hysteretic forces, the inelastic behavior of the full finite element model is incorporated into the condensed model. The parameters of these hysteretic forces are easily tuned, in order to fit the inelastic behavior of the condensed structure to that of the full model under a variety of simple loading scenarios. The fidelity of structural models condensed in this way is demonstrated via simulation for different ground motion intensities on three different building structures with various heights. The simplicity, accuracy, and efficiency of this approach could significantly alleviate the computational burden of performance-based earthquake engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 629
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings
    Chopra, AK
    Goel, RK
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (03): : 561 - 582
  • [2] A Drift Pushover Analysis Procedure for Estimating the Seismic Demands of Buildings
    Sahraei, Arash
    Behnamfar, Farhad
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (04) : 1601 - 1618
  • [3] A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings
    Poursha, Mehdi
    Khoshnoudian, Faramarz
    Moghadam, A. S.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (02) : 591 - 599
  • [4] Higher modes contribution for estimating the inelastic deformation ratios and seismic demands of structures
    Mechaala, Abdelmounaim
    Benazouz, Chikh
    Zedira, Hamma
    Mehani, Youcef
    Guezouli, Samy
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) : 591 - 601
  • [5] Higher modes contribution for estimating the inelastic deformation ratios and seismic demands of structures
    Abdelmounaim Mechaala
    Chikh Benazouz
    Hamma Zedira
    Youcef Mehani
    Samy Guezouli
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33 : 591 - 601
  • [6] Simplified procedure for the estimation of local inelastic deformation demands for seismic performance assessment of buildings
    Araujo, Miguel
    Castro, Jose Miguel
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2017, 46 (03): : 491 - 514
  • [7] Estimating Water Demands in Buildings
    Omaghomi, T.
    Buchberger, S.
    16TH WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS CONFERENCE (WDSA2014): URBAN WATER HYDROINFORMATICS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING, 2014, 89 : 1013 - 1022
  • [8] Evaluation of the MPA Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands: RC-SMRF Buildings
    Bobadilla, Hugo
    Chopra, Anil K.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (04) : 827 - 845
  • [9] Simple models for inelastic seismic analysis of asymmetric multistory RC buildings
    Kosmopoulos, A. J.
    Fardis, M. N.
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2008, 12 (05) : 704 - 727
  • [10] Seismic structural demands and inelastic deformation ratios: Sensitivity analysis and simplified models
    Chikh, Benazouz
    Laouami, Nacer
    Mebarki, Ahmed
    Leblouba, Moussa
    Mehani, Youcef
    Kibboua, Abderrahmane
    Hadid, Mohamed
    Benouar, Djillali
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 13 (01) : 59 - 66