Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam

被引:141
|
作者
Mesnil, Malcie [1 ,2 ]
Capdevila, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Bringuier, Sophie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Trine, Pierre-Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Falquet, Yoan [1 ,2 ]
Charbit, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Roustan, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
Chanques, Gerald
Jaber, Samir
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 1, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Lapeyronie DAR A, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Lapeyronie Hosp, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med INSERM, Equipe Soutenue Reg & Inserm ERI, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[3] Arnaud Villeneuve Univ Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Med Biostat, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
Mechanical ventilation; Inhaled sedation; Analgesiasedation; Weaning; Extubation; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; ANESTHETIC-CONSERVING-DEVICE; PROLONGED SEDATION; ISOFLURANE; DURATION; PAIN; REMIFENTANIL; INTERRUPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-011-2187-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
To evaluate efficacy and adverse events related to inhaled sevoflurane for long-term sedation compared with standard intravenous (IV) sedation with propofol or midazolam. Randomized controlled trial. Sixty intensive care unit (ICU) patients expected to require more than 24 h sedation were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group S, inhaled sevoflurane; group P, IV propofol; group M, IV midazolam. All patients also received IV remifentanil for goal-directed sedation (Ramsay scale and pain score) until extubation or for a maximum of 96 h. Primary end points were wake-up times and extubation delay from termination of sedative administration. Proportion of time within Ramsay score 3-4, IV morphine consumption at 24 h post extubation, hallucination episodes after end of sedation, adverse events, inorganic fluoride plasma levels, and ambient sevoflurane concentrations were recorded. Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Wake-up time and extubation delay were significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in group S (18.6 +/- A 11.8 and 33.6 +/- A 13.1 min) than in group P (91.3 +/- A 35.2 and 326.11 +/- A 360.2 min) or M (260.2 +/- A 150.2 and 599.6 +/- A 586.6 min). Proportion of time within desired interval of sedation score was comparable between groups. Morphine consumption during the 24 h following extubation was lower in group S than in groups P and M. Four hallucination episodes were reported in group P, five in group M, and none in group S (P = 0.04). No hepatic or renal adverse events were reported. Mean plasma fluoride value was 82 mu mol l(-1) (range 12-220 mu mol l(-1)), and mean ambient sevoflurane concentration was 0.3 +/- A 0.1 ppm. Long-term inhaled sevoflurane sedation seems to be a safe and effective alternative to IV propofol or midazolam. It decreases wake-up and extubation times, and post extubation morphine consumption, and increases awakening quality.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 941
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROPOFOL VERSUS MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION IN ADULT PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (ICU): A META-ANALYSIS
    Garcia, R.
    Salluh, J. I. F.
    Andrade, R.
    Farah, D.
    da Silva, P. S. L.
    Bastos, D. F.
    Fonseca, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S233 - S233
  • [42] Short- and long-term follow-up of intensive care unit patients after sedation with isoflurane and midazolam -: A pilot study
    Sackey, Peter V.
    Martling, Claes-Roland
    Carlswaerd, Christine
    Sundin, Oerjan
    Radell, Peter J.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (03) : 801 - 806
  • [43] Sequential use of midazolam and propofol for long-term sedation in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients
    Saito, M
    Terao, Y
    Fukusaki, M
    Makita, T
    Shibata, O
    Sumikawa, K
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (03): : 834 - 838
  • [44] Metabolic, biochemical and haemodynamic effects of infusion of propofol for long-term sedation of children undergoing intensive care
    Martin, PH
    Murthy, BVS
    Petros, AJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 79 (03) : 276 - 279
  • [45] Propofol in patients needing long-term sedation in intensive care: an assessment of the development of tolerance - A pilot study
    Buckley, PM
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (09) : 969 - 974
  • [46] Propofol in patients needing long-term sedation in intensive care: an assessment of the development of tolerance A pilot study
    P. M. Buckley
    Intensive Care Medicine, 1997, 23 : 969 - 974
  • [47] Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam/propofol sedation reduces delirium in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xing, Shunpeng
    Ding, Jia
    Wang, Jiemin
    Jiang, Tao
    He, Zhengyu
    Gao, Yuan
    Li, Wen
    Wen, Daxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (08): : 7727 - 7739
  • [48] Midazolam and propofol used alone or sequentially for long-term sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective, randomized study
    Zhou, Yongfang
    Jin, Xiaodong
    Kang, Yan
    Liang, Guopeng
    Liu, Tingting
    Deng, Ni
    CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (03):
  • [49] Midazolam and propofol used alone or sequentially for long-term sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective, randomized study
    Yongfang Zhou
    Xiaodong Jin
    Yan Kang
    Guopeng Liang
    Tingting Liu
    Ni Deng
    Critical Care, 18
  • [50] Sedation in the intensive care unit with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl: a randomised, open-label, pharmacoeconomic trial
    Muellejans, Bernd
    Matthey, Thomas
    Scholpp, Joachim
    Schill, Markus
    CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (03)