Long-term sedation in intensive care unit: a randomized comparison between inhaled sevoflurane and intravenous propofol or midazolam

被引:141
|
作者
Mesnil, Malcie [1 ,2 ]
Capdevila, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Bringuier, Sophie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Trine, Pierre-Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Falquet, Yoan [1 ,2 ]
Charbit, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Roustan, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
Chanques, Gerald
Jaber, Samir
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier 1, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Lapeyronie DAR A, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Lapeyronie Hosp, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med INSERM, Equipe Soutenue Reg & Inserm ERI, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[3] Arnaud Villeneuve Univ Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Med Biostat, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
关键词
Mechanical ventilation; Inhaled sedation; Analgesiasedation; Weaning; Extubation; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; ANESTHETIC-CONSERVING-DEVICE; PROLONGED SEDATION; ISOFLURANE; DURATION; PAIN; REMIFENTANIL; INTERRUPTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-011-2187-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
To evaluate efficacy and adverse events related to inhaled sevoflurane for long-term sedation compared with standard intravenous (IV) sedation with propofol or midazolam. Randomized controlled trial. Sixty intensive care unit (ICU) patients expected to require more than 24 h sedation were randomly assigned to one of three groups: group S, inhaled sevoflurane; group P, IV propofol; group M, IV midazolam. All patients also received IV remifentanil for goal-directed sedation (Ramsay scale and pain score) until extubation or for a maximum of 96 h. Primary end points were wake-up times and extubation delay from termination of sedative administration. Proportion of time within Ramsay score 3-4, IV morphine consumption at 24 h post extubation, hallucination episodes after end of sedation, adverse events, inorganic fluoride plasma levels, and ambient sevoflurane concentrations were recorded. Forty-seven patients were analyzed. Wake-up time and extubation delay were significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in group S (18.6 +/- A 11.8 and 33.6 +/- A 13.1 min) than in group P (91.3 +/- A 35.2 and 326.11 +/- A 360.2 min) or M (260.2 +/- A 150.2 and 599.6 +/- A 586.6 min). Proportion of time within desired interval of sedation score was comparable between groups. Morphine consumption during the 24 h following extubation was lower in group S than in groups P and M. Four hallucination episodes were reported in group P, five in group M, and none in group S (P = 0.04). No hepatic or renal adverse events were reported. Mean plasma fluoride value was 82 mu mol l(-1) (range 12-220 mu mol l(-1)), and mean ambient sevoflurane concentration was 0.3 +/- A 0.1 ppm. Long-term inhaled sevoflurane sedation seems to be a safe and effective alternative to IV propofol or midazolam. It decreases wake-up and extubation times, and post extubation morphine consumption, and increases awakening quality.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 941
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The risk of delirium after sedation with propofol or midazolam in intensive care unit patients
    van Gelder, Thomas G.
    van Diem-Zaal, Irene J.
    Dijkstra-Kersten, Sandra M. A.
    de Mul, Nikki
    Lalmohamed, Arief
    Slooter, Arjen J. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 90 (06) : 1471 - 1479
  • [22] Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
    Ng, E.
    Taddio, A.
    Ohlsson, A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (06):
  • [23] Propofol versus midazolam for sedation in the intensive care unit - A meta-analysis
    Bryden, KE
    Hail, RI
    Mclaren, R
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (01) : A165 - A165
  • [24] Inhalation sedation for postoperative patients in the intensive care unit: initial sevoflurane concentration and comparison of opioid use with propofol sedation
    Jung, Seungho
    Na, Sungwon
    Kim, Hye Bin
    Joo, Hye Ji
    Kim, Jeongmin
    ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 35 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [25] Comparison of midazolam, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine sedation in intensive care unit
    Turan, G.
    Dincer, E.
    Ozgultekin, A.
    Baskilic, N.
    Kucuk, H.
    Akgun, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 174 - 175
  • [26] Renal and hepatic integrity in long-term sevoflurane sedation using the anesthetic conserving device: a comparison with intravenous propofol sedation in an animal model
    Gallego, L.
    Soro, M.
    Alvarino, A.
    Noguera, I.
    Belda, F. J.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2015, 62 (04): : 191 - 203
  • [27] Comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol/midazolam in sedation of long-stay intensive care patients: a prospective randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
    J Takala
    S Nunes
    I Parviainen
    S Jakob
    M Kaukonen
    S Shepherd
    R Bratty
    E Ruokonen
    Critical Care, 11 (Suppl 2):
  • [28] CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS MIDAZOLAM INFUSION FOR SEDATION IN THE PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT
    SILVASI, DL
    ROSEN, DA
    ROSEN, KR
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (03): : 286 - 288
  • [29] Pharmacoecononomic evaluation of sedation with remifentanil/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl in the intensive care unit
    Muellejans, B
    Matthey, T
    Schill, M
    Welte, R
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (06) : A15 - A15
  • [30] Comparison between dexmedetomidine and propofol for sedation in the intensive care unit: patient and clinician perceptions
    Venn, RM
    Grounds, RM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (05) : 684 - 690