Contingent Capture Effects in Temporal Order Judgments

被引:11
|
作者
Born, Sabine [1 ,2 ]
Kerzel, Dirk [1 ]
Pratt, Jay [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol Sci Educ, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Paris 05, Lab Psychol Percept, Ctr Attent & Vis, Paris, France
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
visual spatial attention; contingent capture; prior entry; temporal order judgments; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL SETTINGS; VISUAL PRIOR-ENTRY; DIRECT PARAMETER SPECIFICATION; TOP-DOWN CONTROL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; REACTION-TIME; ABRUPT-ONSET; COLOR; SET; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1037/xhp0000058
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The contingent attentional capture hypothesis proposes that visual stimuli that do not possess characteristics relevant for the current task will not capture attention, irrespective of their bottom-up saliency. Typically, contingent capture is tested in a spatial cuing paradigm, comparing manual reaction times (RTs) across different conditions. However, attention may act through several mechanisms and RTs may not be ideal to disentangle those different components. In 3 experiments, we examined whether color singleton cues provoke cuing effects in temporal order judgments (TOJs) and whether they would be contingent on attentional control sets. Experiment 1 showed that color singleton cues indeed produce cuing effects in TOJs, even in a cluttered and dynamic target display containing multiple heterogeneous distractors. In Experiment 2, consistent with contingent capture, we observed reliable cuing effects only when the singleton cue matched participants' current attentional control set. Experiment 3 suggests that a sensory interaction account of the differences found in Experiment 2 is unlikely. Our results help to discern the attentional components that may play a role in contingent capture. Further, we discuss a number of other effects (e.g., reversed cuing effects) that are found in RTs, but so far have not been reported in TOJs. Those differences suggest that RTs are influenced by a multitude of mechanisms; however, not all of these mechanisms may affect TOJs. We conclude by highlighting how the study of attentional capture in TOJs provides valuable insights for the attention literature, but also for studies concerned with the perceived timing between stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1006
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments
    Craig, JC
    Busey, TA
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (01): : 81 - 94
  • [42] Spatial modulation of tactile temporal-order judgments
    Shore, DI
    Gray, K
    Spry, E
    Spence, C
    PERCEPTION, 2005, 34 (10) : 1251 - 1262
  • [43] Multisensory temporal order judgments: the role of hemispheric redundancy
    Zampini, M
    Shore, DI
    Spence, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 50 (1-2) : 165 - 180
  • [44] Bayesian calibration of simultaneity in somatosensory temporal order judgments
    Miyazaki, Makoto
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Uchida, Sunao
    Kitazawa, Shigeru
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 55 : S235 - S235
  • [45] PERCEPTION OF TEMPORAL ORDER AND LOUDNESS JUDGMENTS FOR DICHOTIC CLICKS
    BABKOFF, H
    SUTTON, S
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1963, 35 (04): : 574 - &
  • [46] CONTINGENT AFTEREFFECTS IN DURATION JUDGMENTS
    ALLAN, LG
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1984, 423 (MAY) : 116 - 130
  • [47] A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects
    Christian Büsel
    Martin Voracek
    Ulrich Ansorge
    Psychological Research, 2020, 84 : 784 - 809
  • [48] A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects
    Buesel, Christian
    Voracek, Martin
    Ansorge, Ulrich
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2020, 84 (03): : 784 - 809
  • [49] 2 NEW CONTINGENT AFTEREFFECTS - PERCEIVED AUDITORY DURATION CONTINGENT ON PITCH AND ON TEMPORAL-ORDER
    WALKER, JT
    IRION, AL
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 26 (03): : 241 - 244
  • [50] NEURAL CORRELATES OF AUDIOVISUAL TEMPORAL PROCESSING - COMPARISON OF TEMPORAL ORDER AND SIMULTANEITY JUDGMENTS
    Binder, M.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 300 : 432 - 447