Contingent Capture Effects in Temporal Order Judgments

被引:11
|
作者
Born, Sabine [1 ,2 ]
Kerzel, Dirk [1 ]
Pratt, Jay [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Psychol Sci Educ, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Paris 05, Lab Psychol Percept, Ctr Attent & Vis, Paris, France
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
visual spatial attention; contingent capture; prior entry; temporal order judgments; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL SETTINGS; VISUAL PRIOR-ENTRY; DIRECT PARAMETER SPECIFICATION; TOP-DOWN CONTROL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; REACTION-TIME; ABRUPT-ONSET; COLOR; SET; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1037/xhp0000058
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The contingent attentional capture hypothesis proposes that visual stimuli that do not possess characteristics relevant for the current task will not capture attention, irrespective of their bottom-up saliency. Typically, contingent capture is tested in a spatial cuing paradigm, comparing manual reaction times (RTs) across different conditions. However, attention may act through several mechanisms and RTs may not be ideal to disentangle those different components. In 3 experiments, we examined whether color singleton cues provoke cuing effects in temporal order judgments (TOJs) and whether they would be contingent on attentional control sets. Experiment 1 showed that color singleton cues indeed produce cuing effects in TOJs, even in a cluttered and dynamic target display containing multiple heterogeneous distractors. In Experiment 2, consistent with contingent capture, we observed reliable cuing effects only when the singleton cue matched participants' current attentional control set. Experiment 3 suggests that a sensory interaction account of the differences found in Experiment 2 is unlikely. Our results help to discern the attentional components that may play a role in contingent capture. Further, we discuss a number of other effects (e.g., reversed cuing effects) that are found in RTs, but so far have not been reported in TOJs. Those differences suggest that RTs are influenced by a multitude of mechanisms; however, not all of these mechanisms may affect TOJs. We conclude by highlighting how the study of attentional capture in TOJs provides valuable insights for the attention literature, but also for studies concerned with the perceived timing between stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1006
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments
    Vatakis, Argiro
    Navarra, Jordi
    Soto-Faraco, Salvador
    Spence, Charles
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 185 (03) : 521 - 529
  • [32] Limitation of the Temporal Effects of Judgments of the ECJ
    Lang, Michael
    INTERTAX, 2007, 35 (04): : 230 - 245
  • [33] The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments
    James C. Craig
    Thomas A. Busey
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2003, 65 : 81 - 94
  • [34] Bayesian Calibration of Simultaneity in Audiovisual Temporal Order Judgments
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Miyazaki, Makoto
    Iwano, Takayuki
    Kitazawa, Shigeru
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07):
  • [35] A Dynamic Neural Field Model of Temporal Order Judgments
    Hecht, Lauren N.
    Spencer, John P.
    Vecera, Shaun P.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 41 (06) : 1718 - 1733
  • [36] AUDITORY TEMPORAL ORDER JUDGMENTS PERTURBED BY TACTILE STIMULI
    SHERRICK, CE
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1971, 50 (01): : 86 - &
  • [37] Patients with schizophrenia selectively impaired in temporal order judgments
    Capa, Remi L.
    Duval, Celine Z.
    Blaison, Dorine
    Giersch, Anne
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2014, 156 (01) : 51 - 55
  • [38] GLOBAL PATTERN PERCEPTION AND TEMPORAL-ORDER JUDGMENTS
    WARREN, RM
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1992, 15 (02) : 230 - 231
  • [39] Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals
    Occelli, Valeria
    Spence, Charles
    Zampini, Massimiliano
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2008, 46 (11) : 2845 - 2850
  • [40] TEMPORAL-ORDER JUDGMENTS IN GOOD AND POOR READERS
    MAY, JG
    WILLIAMS, MC
    DUNLAP, WP
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1984, 22 (04) : 280 - 280