A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part II: Analogs Selection and Comparison of Techniques

被引:31
|
作者
Atencia, Aitor [1 ]
Zawadzki, Isztar [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, JS Marshall Radar Observ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
CONTINENTAL RADAR IMAGES; OROGRAPHIC RAINFALL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; SCALE-DEPENDENCE; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTABILITY; FORECASTS; EXTRAPOLATION; UNCERTAINTY; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-14-00342.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Nowcasting is the short-range forecast obtained from the latest observed state. Currently, heuristic techniques, such as Lagrangian extrapolation, are the most commonly used for rainfall forecasting. However, the Lagrangian extrapolation technique does not account for changes in the motion field or growth and decay of precipitation. These errors are difficult to analytically model and are normally introduced by stochastic processes. According to the chaos theory, similar states, also called analogs, evolve in a similar way plus an error related with the predictability of the situation. Consequently, finding these states in a historical dataset provides a way of forecasting that includes all the physical processes such as growth and decay, among others. The difficulty of this approach lies in finding these analogs. In this study, recent radar observations are compared with a 15-yr radar dataset. Similar states within the dataset are selected according to their spatial rainfall patterns, temporal storm evolution, and synoptic patterns to generate ensembles. This ensemble of analog states is verified against observations for four different events. In addition, it is compared with the previously mentioned Lagrangian stochastic ensemble by means of different scores. This comparison shows the weaknesses and strengths of each technique. This could provide critical information for a future hybrid analog-stochastic nowcasting technique.
引用
收藏
页码:2890 / 2908
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES IN INVOLUTIONAL ENTROPION
    Beginoglu, Muhittin
    Yeniad, Baris
    Kozer Bilgin, Lale
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2009, 72 (02): : 43 - 46
  • [42] A Test Comparison of Two Techniques In Readership Research
    Woodyatt, Philip C.
    JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1942, 19 (02): : 185 - 192
  • [43] Comparison of two tree apex delineation techniques
    Walsworth, N
    King, D
    AUTOMATED INTERPRETATION OF HIGH SPATIAL RESOLUTION DIGITAL IMAGERY FOR FORESTRY, INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 1999, : 93 - 104
  • [44] Comparison of two techniques of diagnosis of giardiasis in dogs
    Decock, C
    Cadiergues, MC
    Larcher, M
    Vermot, S
    Franc, M
    PARASITE, 2003, 10 (01) : 69 - 72
  • [45] Comparison of two different techniques of fibreoptic intubation
    Piepho, Tim
    Thierbach, Andreas R.
    Goebler, Susanne M.
    Maybauer, Marc O.
    Werner, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (04) : 328 - 332
  • [46] Comparison of two Surgical Techniques for Rhinoplasty Comment
    Lehnerdt, Gotz
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2025, 104 (03) : 156 - 156
  • [47] Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear
    Peters, MCRB
    Delong, R
    Pintado, MR
    Pallesen, U
    Qvist, V
    Douglas, WH
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1999, 27 (07) : 479 - 485
  • [48] Comparison of two techniques for surgical eyebrow suspension
    Sugino, P.
    Meneghim, R. L. F. S.
    Schellini, S. A.
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2022, 45 (07): : 741 - 747
  • [49] A comparison of two spherical wave expansion techniques
    Yaccarino, RG
    Rengarajan, SR
    ELECTROMAGNETICS, 1997, 17 (01) : 75 - 87
  • [50] Infant hearing screening: a comparison of two techniques
    Winton, A
    Smyth, V
    Kei, J
    McPherson, B
    Latham, S
    Loscher, J
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 22 (02) : 261 - 265