A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part II: Analogs Selection and Comparison of Techniques

被引:31
|
作者
Atencia, Aitor [1 ]
Zawadzki, Isztar [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, JS Marshall Radar Observ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
CONTINENTAL RADAR IMAGES; OROGRAPHIC RAINFALL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; SCALE-DEPENDENCE; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTABILITY; FORECASTS; EXTRAPOLATION; UNCERTAINTY; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-14-00342.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Nowcasting is the short-range forecast obtained from the latest observed state. Currently, heuristic techniques, such as Lagrangian extrapolation, are the most commonly used for rainfall forecasting. However, the Lagrangian extrapolation technique does not account for changes in the motion field or growth and decay of precipitation. These errors are difficult to analytically model and are normally introduced by stochastic processes. According to the chaos theory, similar states, also called analogs, evolve in a similar way plus an error related with the predictability of the situation. Consequently, finding these states in a historical dataset provides a way of forecasting that includes all the physical processes such as growth and decay, among others. The difficulty of this approach lies in finding these analogs. In this study, recent radar observations are compared with a 15-yr radar dataset. Similar states within the dataset are selected according to their spatial rainfall patterns, temporal storm evolution, and synoptic patterns to generate ensembles. This ensemble of analog states is verified against observations for four different events. In addition, it is compared with the previously mentioned Lagrangian stochastic ensemble by means of different scores. This comparison shows the weaknesses and strengths of each technique. This could provide critical information for a future hybrid analog-stochastic nowcasting technique.
引用
收藏
页码:2890 / 2908
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of two endoscopic spine surgical techniques
    Sebben, Andre Luis
    Kulcheski, Alynson Larocca
    Graells, Xavier Soler, I
    Benato, Marcel Luiz
    Del Santoro, Pedro Grein
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2021, 67 (02): : 243 - 247
  • [32] Comparison of Two Different Intravitreal Injection Techniques
    Uy, Harvey S.
    Artiaga, Jose Carlo M.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 15 : 2383 - 2389
  • [33] COMPARISON OF TWO NEMATODE EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES.
    Plaisance, A.
    Yan, G.
    JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 2015, 47 (03) : 263 - 264
  • [34] Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts
    Gesi, A
    Magnolfi, S
    Goracci, C
    Ferrari, M
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (09) : 580 - 582
  • [35] Comparison for two deconvolution techniques of terahertz signal
    Liu, Haishun
    Zhang, Zhenwei
    Zhang, Cunlin
    Han, Donghai
    INFRARED, MILLIMETER-WAVE, AND TERAHERTZ TECHNOLOGIES VI, 2019, 11196
  • [36] Comparison of two different meat inspection techniques
    Kobe, A
    Bandick, N
    Koopmann, L
    Dahms, S
    Weiss, H
    Fries, R
    VETERINARY QUARTERLY, 2000, 22 (02) : 75 - 83
  • [37] Mechanized proofs of opacity: a comparison of two techniques
    Derrick, John
    Doherty, Simon
    Dongol, Brijesh
    Schellhorn, Gerhard
    Travkin, Oleg
    Wehrheim, Heike
    FORMAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING, 2018, 30 (05) : 597 - 625
  • [38] Comparison of two spherical wave expansion techniques
    Hughes Aircraft Co, Los Angeles, United States
    Electromagnetics, 1 (17:75-87):
  • [39] Comparison of two techniques for monitoring of human movements
    Wagner, Jakub
    Mazurek, Pawel
    Miekina, Andrzej
    Morawski, Roman Z.
    Jacobsen, Frode Fadnes
    Sudmann, Tobba Therkildsen
    Borsheim, Ingebjorg Traeland
    Ovsthus, Knut
    Ciamulski, Tomasz
    MEASUREMENT, 2017, 111 : 420 - 431
  • [40] Comparison of two techniques in quality chest compressions
    Heidarzadeh, Hamid
    Moradi, Abbas
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2021, 25 (04) : 552 - 553