A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part II: Analogs Selection and Comparison of Techniques

被引:31
|
作者
Atencia, Aitor [1 ]
Zawadzki, Isztar [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, JS Marshall Radar Observ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2K6, Canada
关键词
CONTINENTAL RADAR IMAGES; OROGRAPHIC RAINFALL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; SCALE-DEPENDENCE; PRECIPITATION; PREDICTABILITY; FORECASTS; EXTRAPOLATION; UNCERTAINTY; RESOLUTION;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-14-00342.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Nowcasting is the short-range forecast obtained from the latest observed state. Currently, heuristic techniques, such as Lagrangian extrapolation, are the most commonly used for rainfall forecasting. However, the Lagrangian extrapolation technique does not account for changes in the motion field or growth and decay of precipitation. These errors are difficult to analytically model and are normally introduced by stochastic processes. According to the chaos theory, similar states, also called analogs, evolve in a similar way plus an error related with the predictability of the situation. Consequently, finding these states in a historical dataset provides a way of forecasting that includes all the physical processes such as growth and decay, among others. The difficulty of this approach lies in finding these analogs. In this study, recent radar observations are compared with a 15-yr radar dataset. Similar states within the dataset are selected according to their spatial rainfall patterns, temporal storm evolution, and synoptic patterns to generate ensembles. This ensemble of analog states is verified against observations for four different events. In addition, it is compared with the previously mentioned Lagrangian stochastic ensemble by means of different scores. This comparison shows the weaknesses and strengths of each technique. This could provide critical information for a future hybrid analog-stochastic nowcasting technique.
引用
收藏
页码:2890 / 2908
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Two Techniques for Generating Nowcasting Ensembles. Part I: Lagrangian Ensemble Technique
    Atencia, Aitor
    Zawadzki, Isztar
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2014, 142 (11) : 4036 - 4052
  • [2] Comparison of different optimization techniques in antenna design - Part II
    Zich, R. E.
    Mussetta, M.
    Grimaccia, F.
    Banchetti, J.
    Guggiari, T.
    Catelan, A. Oregio
    Lo Presti, F.
    Testoni, O.
    Zanelli, T.
    2012 IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM (APSURSI), 2012,
  • [3] An empirical comparison of two safe regression test selection techniques
    Frankl, PG
    Rothermel, G
    Sayre, K
    Vokolos, FI
    2003 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 195 - 204
  • [4] COMPARISON OF FILTER TECHNIQUES FOR TWO-STEP FEATURE SELECTION
    Drotar, Peter
    Simonak, Slavomir
    Pietrikova, Emilia
    Chovanec, Martin
    Chovancova, Eva
    Adam, Norbert
    Szabo, Csaba
    Balaz, Anton
    Binas, Miroslav
    COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2017, 36 (03) : 597 - 617
  • [5] Comparison of cooperative path selection techniques
    Eksim, Ai
    Celebi, Mehmet E.
    2007 IEEE 15TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 511 - +
  • [6] A Comparison of Social Service Selection Techniques
    Billionniere, Elodie
    Greiman, David
    Gosha, Kinnis
    EIGHTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 260 - +
  • [7] Comparison of four parameter selection techniques
    Hereford, J
    IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2001: ENGINEERING THE FUTURE, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 11 - 16
  • [8] A Comparison of Item Selection Techniques for Testlets
    Murphy, Daniel L.
    Dodd, Barbara G.
    Vaughn, Brandon K.
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 34 (06) : 424 - 437
  • [9] COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES FOR SELECTION OF MOTILE SPERMATOZOA
    BERGER, T
    MARRS, RP
    MOYER, DL
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1985, 43 (02) : 268 - 273
  • [10] A comparison of techniques for generating forest ownership spatial products
    Butler, Brett J.
    Hewes, Jaketon H.
    Liknes, Greg C.
    Nelson, Mark D.
    Snyder, Stephanie A.
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 46 : 21 - 34