Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Kajdy, Anna [1 ]
Modzelewski, Jan [1 ]
Jakubiak, Monika [1 ]
Pokropek, Artur [2 ]
Rabijewski, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Reprod Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Philosophy & Sociol, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0224553
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10th centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of perinatal outcome especially in low risk populations. Our primary aim was to compare the odds ratios for unfavorable outcome in a risk stratified cohort of SGA neonates in regard to prenatal detection status. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analysing the effect of prenatal detection on perinatal outcome. This cohort has been divided into a predefined low-risk and high-risk population. Electronic records of 39,032 singleton deliveries from 2010 through 2016 were analysed. SGA was defined as newborn weight below the 10th percentile on the Fenton growth chart. Detected SGA (dSGA) neonates were those that were admitted for delivery with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abnormal growth. Undetected SGA (uSGA) were neonates that were found to be below the 10th percentile after birth. Perinatal and neonatal outcome was compared. Results The detection rate in high-risk pregnancies was almost 45.7% versus low risk where it amounted to 18.9%. In both the high-risk and low-risk populations there was a significantly higher risk of composite mortality for undetected SGA compared to approporiate-for-gestational-age (AGA) (OR 7.95 CI 4.76-13.29; OR 14.4 CI 4.99-41.45 respectively). The odds for the composite neonatal outcome were significantly higher for dSGA and uSGA than for AGA in all the studied populations except for the uSGA in high risk population (OR 1.57 CI 0.97-3.53). Importantly, there was not a single case of intrauterine fetal death among detected SGA, in the low risk group. Conclusions Prenatal detection of SGA status is related to perinatal outcomes, especially mortality. Therefore, assessment of SGA status even in low-risk pregnancies could help predict potential perinatal and neonatal complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The risk of prematurity and small-for-gestational-age birth in Mexico City: The effects of working conditions and antenatal leave
    CeronMireles, P
    Harlow, SD
    SanchezCarrillo, CI
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1996, 86 (06) : 825 - 831
  • [42] Antihypertensive Medication Use During Pregnancy and the Risk of Major Congenital Malformations or Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns
    Nakhai-Pour, H. R.
    Rey, E.
    Berard, A.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART B-DEVELOPMENTAL AND REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 89 (02) : 147 - 154
  • [43] Antihypertensive Medication Use during Pregnancy and the Risk of Major Congenital Malformations or Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns
    Nakhai-Pour, Hamid Reza
    Rey, Evelyne
    Berard, Anick
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2009, 18 : S76 - S76
  • [44] Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age and preterm births among 19,269 Tanzanian newborns
    Muhihi, Alfa
    Sudfeld, Christopher R.
    Smith, Emily R.
    Noor, Ramadhani A.
    Mshamu, Salum
    Briegleb, Christina
    Bakari, Mohamed
    Masanja, Honorati
    Fawzi, Wafaie
    Chan, Grace Jean-Yee
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [45] SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    WATT, J
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 102 (879) : 594 - 594
  • [46] ANTENATAL SCREENING OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS BY SYMPHYSIAL FUNDAL HEIGHT MEASUREMENT
    LINASMITA, V
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND, 1985, 68 (11): : 587 - 591
  • [47] Mode of Delivery and Neonatal Outcomes in Preterm, Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns Reply
    Werner, Erika Franklin
    Lipkind, Heather
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (06): : 1479 - 1479
  • [48] SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    BRYSON, JG
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 102 (878) : 564 - 564
  • [49] EVALUATION OF FAT AND NITROGEN FAECAL LOSSES IN ADEQUATE-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE AND SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE PRETERM NEWBORNS
    Corvaglia, L.
    De Giorgi, M.
    Mariani, E.
    Spinelli, M.
    Spizzichino, M.
    Legnani, E.
    Faldella, G.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2010, 42 : S351 - S351
  • [50] NEONATAL THYROID-FUNCTION IN FULLTERM, SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE AND PREMATURE NEWBORNS
    KLETT, M
    MAYER, P
    SCHONBERG, D
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1978, 12 (11) : 1085 - 1085