Effect of antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age newborns in a risk stratified retrospective cohort

被引:7
|
作者
Kajdy, Anna [1 ]
Modzelewski, Jan [1 ]
Jakubiak, Monika [1 ]
Pokropek, Artur [2 ]
Rabijewski, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Postgrad Med Educ, Dept Reprod Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Philosophy & Sociol, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
FETAL-GROWTH RESTRICTION; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0224553
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) are neonates born with birth weight below the 10th centile for a given week of pregnancy. It is a risk factor of perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing debate whether prenatal detection of SGA neonates is good predictor of perinatal outcome especially in low risk populations. Our primary aim was to compare the odds ratios for unfavorable outcome in a risk stratified cohort of SGA neonates in regard to prenatal detection status. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study analysing the effect of prenatal detection on perinatal outcome. This cohort has been divided into a predefined low-risk and high-risk population. Electronic records of 39,032 singleton deliveries from 2010 through 2016 were analysed. SGA was defined as newborn weight below the 10th percentile on the Fenton growth chart. Detected SGA (dSGA) neonates were those that were admitted for delivery with a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of abnormal growth. Undetected SGA (uSGA) were neonates that were found to be below the 10th percentile after birth. Perinatal and neonatal outcome was compared. Results The detection rate in high-risk pregnancies was almost 45.7% versus low risk where it amounted to 18.9%. In both the high-risk and low-risk populations there was a significantly higher risk of composite mortality for undetected SGA compared to approporiate-for-gestational-age (AGA) (OR 7.95 CI 4.76-13.29; OR 14.4 CI 4.99-41.45 respectively). The odds for the composite neonatal outcome were significantly higher for dSGA and uSGA than for AGA in all the studied populations except for the uSGA in high risk population (OR 1.57 CI 0.97-3.53). Importantly, there was not a single case of intrauterine fetal death among detected SGA, in the low risk group. Conclusions Prenatal detection of SGA status is related to perinatal outcomes, especially mortality. Therefore, assessment of SGA status even in low-risk pregnancies could help predict potential perinatal and neonatal complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH OF CEREBELLAR VERMIS BETWEEN APPROPRIATE-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE AND SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE NEWBORNS
    HUANG, CC
    LIU, CC
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 33 (01) : 9 - 19
  • [32] Neonatal hypoglycaemia and body proportionality in small for gestational age newborns: a retrospective cohort study
    Smits, Ilke
    Hoftiezer, Liset
    van Dillen, Jeroen
    Hogeveen, Marije
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 181 (10) : 3655 - 3662
  • [33] Neonatal hypoglycaemia and body proportionality in small for gestational age newborns: a retrospective cohort study
    Ilke Smits
    Liset Hoftiezer
    Jeroen van Dillen
    Marije Hogeveen
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2022, 181 : 3655 - 3662
  • [34] DETECTION AND DELIVERY OF SEVERELY SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE FETUSES
    PALO, P
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 71 (04) : 321 - 322
  • [35] Screening for women at risk for small-for-gestational-age fetus
    Akinro, O.
    Smith, J.
    Sau, A.
    Palaniappan, V
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 17 - 17
  • [36] Induced abortion and risk of small-for-gestational-age birth
    Parazzini, F.
    Cipriani, S.
    Chiaffarino, F.
    Sandretti, F.
    Bortolus, R.
    Chiantera, V.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (11) : 1414 - 1418
  • [37] AN AUDIT OF THE DETECTION AND MANAGEMENT OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE BABIES
    HEPBURN, M
    ROSENBERG, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1986, 93 (03): : 212 - 216
  • [38] Risk factors for small-for-gestational-age and preterm births among 19,269 Tanzanian newborns
    Alfa Muhihi
    Christopher R. Sudfeld
    Emily R. Smith
    Ramadhani A. Noor
    Salum Mshamu
    Christina Briegleb
    Mohamed Bakari
    Honorati Masanja
    Wafaie Fawzi
    Grace Jean-Yee Chan
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [39] Antihypertensive Medication Use during Pregnancy and the Risk of Major Congenital Malformations or Small-for-Gestational-Age Newborns
    Nakhai-Pour, H. R.
    Rey, E.
    Berard, A.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2009, 85 (05) : 416 - 416
  • [40] Risk Factors for Recurrent Small-for-Gestational-Age Birth
    Okah, Felix A.
    Cai, Jinwen
    Dew, Paul C.
    Hoff, Gerald L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 1 - 7