Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography

被引：16

作者：

Grahn, A ^{[1
]}

Hemdal, B

Andersson, I

Ruschin, M

Thilander-Klang, A

Börjesson, S

Tingberg, A

Mattsson, S

Håkansson, M

Båth, M

Månsson, LG

Medin, J

Warmingerl, F

Panzer, W

机构：

[1] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Radiat Phys, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden

[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden

[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden

[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Radiat Protect, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany

来源：

RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY | 2005年 / 114卷 / 1-3期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1093/rpd/nch573

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The European Commission (EC) quality criteria for screen-film mammography are used as a tool to assess image quality. A new set of criteria was developed and initially tested in a previous study. In the present study, these criteria are further evaluated using screen-film mammograms that have been digitised, manipulated to simulate different image quality levels and reprinted on film. Expert radiologists have evaluated these manipulated images using both the original (EC) and the new criteria. A comparison of three different simulated dose levels reveals that the new criteria yield a larger separation of image criteria scores than the old ones. These results indicate that the new set of image quality criteria has a higher discriminative power than the old set and thus seems to be more suitable for evaluation of image quality in mammography.

引用

页码：389 / 394

页数：6

共 50 条

[41] NEW STUDIES OF THE REPRESENTATION OF IMAGE QUALITY BY 2 CRITERIA
HEIDINGER, D
OPTIK, 1981, 58 (01): : 57 - 66
[42] PROPOSALS FOR STANDARDIZING IMAGE QUALITY OF MAMMOGRAPHY
FRISCHBIER, HJ
GREGL, A
HOEFFKEN, W
HUPPE, JR
RADIOLOGE, 1977, 17 (05): : 193 - 194
[43] Technical aspects and image quality in mammography
Haus, A
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1363 - 1363
[44] Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria
Lalji, U. C.
Jeukens, C. R. L. P. N.
Houben, I.
Nelemans, P. J.
van Engen, R. E.
van Wylick, E.
Beets-Tan, R. G. H.
Wildberger, J. E.
Paulis, L. E.
Lobbes, M. B. I.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (10) : 2813 - 2820
[45] Optimizing mammography image quality and dose
Berns, E.
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2260 - 2260
[46] IMAGE QUALITY IN A MAGNIFICATION MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM
SKUCAS, J
GORSKI, J
LOGAN, W
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1977, 22 (03): : 592 - 592
[47] IMAGE QUALITY AND RADIATION EXPOSURE IN MAMMOGRAPHY
WOLF, G
KALLINGER, G
ACTA MEDICA AUSTRIACA, 1984, 11 (02) : 62 - 62
[48] Reference levels for image quality in mammography
Zdesar, Urban
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) : 170 - 172
[49] The Association of Mammography Environment and Image Quality
Sarquis-Kolber, Shakira
Schilling, Kathy
Hanney, William J.
Kolber, Morey J.
JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2020, 2 (05) : 436 - 442
[50] Clinical study in phase-contrast mammography: image-quality analysis
Longo, Renata
Tonutti, Maura
Rigon, Luigi
Arfelli, Fulvia
Dreossi, Diego
Quai, Elisa
Zanconati, Fabrizio
Castelli, Edoardo
Tromba, Giuliana
Cova, Maria A.
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2014, 372 (2010):

← 1 2 3 4 5 →