Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography

被引:16
|
作者
Grahn, A [1 ]
Hemdal, B
Andersson, I
Ruschin, M
Thilander-Klang, A
Börjesson, S
Tingberg, A
Mattsson, S
Håkansson, M
Båth, M
Månsson, LG
Medin, J
Warmingerl, F
Panzer, W
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Med Radiat Phys, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Radiat Protect, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/rpd/nch573
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Commission (EC) quality criteria for screen-film mammography are used as a tool to assess image quality. A new set of criteria was developed and initially tested in a previous study. In the present study, these criteria are further evaluated using screen-film mammograms that have been digitised, manipulated to simulate different image quality levels and reprinted on film. Expert radiologists have evaluated these manipulated images using both the original (EC) and the new criteria. A comparison of three different simulated dose levels reveals that the new criteria yield a larger separation of image criteria scores than the old ones. These results indicate that the new set of image quality criteria has a higher discriminative power than the old set and thus seems to be more suitable for evaluation of image quality in mammography.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 394
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Image Quality in Daily Practice of Breast Cancer Mammography Screening
    Guertin, Marie-Helene
    Theberge, Isabelle
    Dufresne, Michel-Pierre
    Zomahoun, Herve Tchala Vignon
    Major, Diane
    Tremblay, Richard
    Ricard, Carmen
    Shumak, Rene
    Wadden, Nancy
    Pelletier, Eric
    Brisson, Jacques
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2014, 65 (03): : 199 - 206
  • [32] Screening mammography: Clinical image quality and the risk of interval breast cancer
    Taplin, SH
    Rutter, CM
    Finder, C
    Mandelson, MT
    Houn, F
    White, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (04) : 797 - 803
  • [33] Evaluation of the European image quality criteria for chest examinations
    Vano, E
    Guibelalde, E
    Morillo, A
    AlvarezPedrosa, CS
    Fernandez, JM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (816): : 1349 - 1355
  • [34] Mammography image quality evaluation in breast cancer screening: The Saudi experience
    Albeshan, Salman M.
    Alashban, Yazeed
    Al Tahan, Fatina M.
    Al-enezi, Salma
    Alnaimy, Noor
    Shubayr, Nasser
    Eliraqi, Fatma
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [35] Validation of classical and blind criteria for image quality evaluation
    Haindl, Michat
    Simberova, Stanislava
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 2007, : 218 - +
  • [36] A phantom using titanium and Landolt rings for image quality evaluation in mammography
    Gala, Hugo de las Heras
    Schoefer, Felix
    Tiller, Britta
    Chevalier, Margarita
    Zwettler, Georg
    Semturs, Friedrich
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (08): : L17 - L30
  • [37] Image feature evaluation in two new mammography CAD prototypes
    Alexander Hapfelmeier
    Alexander Horsch
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2011, 6 : 721 - 735
  • [38] Image feature evaluation in two new mammography CAD prototypes
    Hapfelmeier, Alexander
    Horsch, Alexander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2011, 6 (06) : 721 - 735
  • [39] Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment: A framework for evaluation of clinical image quality
    Hemmsen, Martin Christian
    Pedersen, Mads Moller
    Nikolov, Svetoslav Ivanov
    Nielsen, Michael Backmann
    Jensen, Jorgen Arendt
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: ULTRASONIC IMAGING, TOMOGRAPHY, AND THERAPY, 2010, 7629
  • [40] IMAGE QUALITY IN MAMMOGRAPHY - DEMONSTRATION OF A NEW QUANTITATIVE PHANTOM ANALYSIS METHOD
    CHAKRABORTY, DP
    YANG, BJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 452 - 452